What will be the outcome of investigations into COVID-19 lab leak theory by end of 2025?
Confirmed lab leak • 25%
Confirmed natural origin • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
No official conclusion • 25%
Reports from international health organizations or government agencies
High-Level Scientists Allegedly Instructed to Suppress COVID-19 Lab Leak Evidence and Pfizer's Vaccine Safety Concerns
Dec 26, 2024, 02:51 AM
Recent reports suggest that high-level scientists were allegedly instructed to suppress evidence related to the origins of COVID-19, particularly concerning a potential lab leak in China. Congressional investigators indicated that Chinese researchers mapped the virus causing COVID-19 at least two weeks prior to Beijing's public disclosure of the virus's details. This revelation challenges previous narratives that labeled the lab leak theory as a conspiracy. Additionally, claims have emerged regarding the COVID-19 vaccine, with allegations of DNA contamination and assertions that Pfizer had evidence linking the vaccine to deaths, which they purportedly concealed. Reports also suggest that the vaccine may exacerbate heart conditions.
View original story
Investigation not completed • 25%
Inconclusive findings • 25%
No suppression found • 25%
Evidence confirmed suppressed • 25%
Calls for more research • 25%
No definitive conclusion • 25%
Confirms lab leak • 25%
Refutes lab leak • 25%
Natural origin confirmed • 25%
Lab leak confirmed • 25%
No investigation • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Denial of allegations • 25%
No official response • 25%
Acknowledgement with justification • 25%
Acknowledgement and apology • 25%
Other • 25%
Lab Leak Theory • 25%
Natural Zoonotic Origin • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No further action taken • 25%
Other • 25%
Policy changes recommended • 25%
Further investigation recommended • 25%
Natural origin • 33%
Lab origin • 33%
Inconclusive • 34%
No such study published • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Supports lab origin • 25%
Supports natural origin • 25%
No new significant findings • 25%
New evidence supports lab origin • 25%
New evidence supports natural origin • 25%
Further research required • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
Decreased trust in health institutions • 25%
Increased trust in health institutions • 25%
No significant change in trust • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Unchanged trust • 25%
No significant data • 25%
Increased trust • 25%
Decreased trust • 25%