What will be the main argument of supporters for the amendment allowing Trump a third term by end of 2025?
Restoring National Strength • 25%
Preserving Democracy • 25%
Ensuring Continuity • 25%
Other • 25%
Public statements, debates, and media coverage
Rep. Ogles Seeks 22nd Amendment Change to Allow Trump Third Term, Excluding Obama
Jan 24, 2025, 01:32 AM
Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) has introduced a House Joint Resolution to amend the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, allowing President Donald Trump to seek a third term in office. The proposed amendment would permit presidents who have served two non-consecutive terms to run for a third term, specifically enabling Trump, who began his second term in 2025, to run again. In November, Trump joked to House Republicans about seeking a third term, saying, "I suspect I won’t be running again, unless you do something." Ogles described Trump as "the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation’s decay," arguing that the 22nd Amendment limits the choice of the American people. The amendment stipulates that "no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms." This specific wording would allow Trump to seek a third term but prevent former presidents who served two consecutive terms, such as Barack Obama, from running again. The proposal has sparked debate over term limits, the constitutional amendment process—which requires significant support in Congress and from the states—and the implications for American democracy.
View original story
Majority opposition • 25%
Majority support from GOP • 25%
Majority support from Democrats • 25%
Bipartisan support • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Trump's leadership on border security • 25%
Trump's stance on social issues • 25%
Trump's energy policy • 25%
Procedural errors • 25%
Presidential immunity • 25%
Lack of evidence • 25%
Other • 25%
Separation of Powers • 25%
Other Argument • 25%
Due Process Violation • 25%
14th Amendment Violation • 25%
Economic growth • 25%
Other • 25%
Innovation • 25%
Skill shortages • 25%
Republican Party • 50%
Democratic Party • 50%
Democratic Party • 25%
Republican Party • 25%
Neither Party • 25%
Both Parties • 25%
Non-consecutive terms not allowed • 25%
Other • 25%
Unresolved • 25%
Non-consecutive terms allowed • 25%
Bipartisan Support • 25%
No Support • 25%
Republican Party • 25%
Democratic Party • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Insufficient Data • 25%
Majority Support • 25%
Majority Oppose • 25%
Evenly Split • 25%