Outcome of USAID foreign aid review by end of 90-day period?
Aid resumed as before • 25%
Aid resumed with modifications • 25%
Aid remains frozen • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Official announcements or press releases from the U.S. government
Trump Administration Suspends 60 USAID Officials Over Alleged Circumvention of Foreign Aid Freeze
Jan 28, 2025, 01:51 AM
President Donald Trump's administration has placed approximately 60 senior officials at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) on administrative leave, accusing them of attempting to circumvent the President's executive orders that freeze all foreign aid pending a 90-day review. Acting Administrator Jason Gray informed staff, stating, 'We have identified several actions within USAID that appear to be designed to circumvent the President's Executive Orders.' The move, which affects over 50 career civil servants, including those in the Global Health bureau, effectively decimates the agency's leadership. The officials were placed on leave Monday after suspicions arose that they were conspiring to continue foreign aid without approval, in violation of the executive orders.
View original story
Aid partially reinstated • 25%
Aid fully reinstated • 25%
Other • 25%
Aid remains frozen • 25%
Minor adjustments made • 25%
Review inconclusive • 25%
Major reforms implemented • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Aid Resumption without Changes • 25%
Permanent Aid Reduction • 25%
Aid Suspension Extended • 25%
Aid Resumption with Changes • 25%
Foreign aid is redirected to new priorities • 25%
Foreign aid resumes as before • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Foreign aid is significantly reduced • 25%
Aid permanently halted • 25%
Aid permanently reduced • 25%
Aid partially resumed • 25%
Aid fully resumed • 25%
Humanitarian Aid • 25%
Environmental Initiatives • 25%
Military Assistance • 25%
Economic Development • 25%
Other • 25%
Department of State • 25%
Department of Defense • 25%
USAID • 25%
Other • 25%
Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness • 25%
Alignment with US Strategic Interests • 25%
Humanitarian Impact • 25%
Increased focus on Africa • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increased focus on Europe • 25%
Increased focus on Asia • 25%
Humanitarian impact • 25%
Economic efficiency • 25%
Security concerns • 25%
Political alignment • 25%
Education Programs • 25%
Health Initiatives • 25%
Economic Development • 25%
Military Assistance • 25%
Global Health bureau • 25%
Other bureau • 25%
Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance bureau • 25%
Economic Growth bureau • 25%