Market
Outcome of Subcommittee Investigation by January 6, 2026
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
No significant findings • 25%
Evidence of FBI misconduct • 25%
Security recommendations • 25%
Other significant findings • 25%
Final report or conclusion issued by the subcommittee, available through official government channels or media reports
Story
House Republicans Form New Subcommittee to Investigate January 6 Events Led by Rep. Barry Loudermilk, Addressing FBI Involvement
Jan 22, 2025, 06:40 PM
House Republicans have established a new select subcommittee to investigate the events surrounding the January 6 insurrection. Announced by Speaker Mike Johnson, the subcommittee will be chaired by Representative Barry Loudermilk, who previously led a counter-investigation during the last Congress. The committee is tasked with uncovering the full truth regarding the events leading up to and following January 6, and it will have the authority to summon FBI officials to provide testimony about their involvement. This move reflects ongoing Republican efforts to scrutinize the actions of the January 6 committee and aims to address concerns regarding FBI conduct during the incident.
View original story
Similar markets
Formal investigation initiated • 25%
No further action taken • 25%
Legal reforms proposed • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Criminal charges recommended • 25%
Other • 25%
No significant findings • 25%
Policy changes recommended • 25%
Republican Party • 25%
Democratic Party • 25%
Media Outlets • 25%
Other • 25%
Formal action taken against FBI • 25%
FBI criticized but no action • 25%
FBI exonerated • 25%
FBI criticized with recommendations • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
Unclear/Other • 25%
No significant issues found • 25%
Significant issues found • 25%
Disciplinary actions • 25%
Recommendations for reform • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Investigation, no action • 25%
No investigation • 25%
Investigation, impeachment proceedings • 25%
Investigation, procedural changes • 25%
No major findings • 25%
Recommendations for policy changes • 25%
Calls for leadership changes • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%