How will major international organizations respond to the Global Gag Rule by end of 2025?
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Official statements and press releases from organizations such as WHO, UN, and Amnesty International
Trump Administration Reinstates Global Gag Rule, Limiting Women's Health Access and Increasing Risks of Unsafe Abortions
Jan 25, 2025, 06:11 PM
The Trump Administration has reinstated the Global Gag Rule, a policy that restricts global health funding for organizations that provide or promote abortion services. Critics, including public health advocates and lawmakers, argue that this move undermines reproductive healthcare and could lead to increased health risks for women. Patty Murray emphasized that the policy caused fear and confusion among health workers and resulted in worse health outcomes during Trump's first term. Melinda Gates highlighted that contraceptives are essential for women's health, and the reinstated restrictions could limit access to these vital resources. Amnesty International criticized the decision as putting millions of lives at risk, while Representative Rosa DeLauro warned that fewer women would have access to family planning services, leading to more unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions. Representative Lois Frankel called the reinstatement a dangerous regression in women's health rights.
View original story
Legal challenge against the policy • 25%
Comply with policy and continue receiving funds • 25%
Refuse funds and continue abortion services • 25%
Seek alternative funding sources • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No official response • 25%
Support • 25%
World Health Organization • 25%
European Union • 25%
Other • 25%
United Nations • 25%
No official response • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Independent initiatives • 25%
Other • 25%
Public condemnation of U.S. decision • 25%
Increased collaboration with WHO • 25%
Criticism of the U.S. decision • 25%
Calls for increased funding from other nations • 25%
Plans for restructuring WHO funding • 25%
Other responses • 25%
Other • 25%
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) • 25%
Amnesty International • 25%
Planned Parenthood • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
No response • 25%
World Health Organization • 25%
UNRWA • 25%
World Food Programme • 25%
Other • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Increased humanitarian aid • 25%
Strong condemnation and sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Calls for ceasefire • 25%
Condemnation of Russia • 25%
Condemnation of Ukraine • 25%
No significant response • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No change • 25%
Significant decrease • 25%
Increase • 25%
Moderate decrease • 25%