First international intervention if Hamas-Israel ceasefire is violated by April 30, 2025?
United Nations • 25%
European Union • 25%
United States • 25%
Other • 25%
Official statements from international bodies such as the United Nations or European Union, covered by news outlets
Hamas, Led by Abu Ubaida, Affirms Ceasefire Commitment Contingent on Israel's Compliance
Jan 19, 2025, 04:17 PM
Hamas has affirmed its commitment to implementing the terms of a ceasefire agreement with Israel, which came into effect recently. The group's military wing, through spokesperson Abu Ubaida, stated that their adherence to the agreement is contingent upon Israel's compliance. Hamas emphasized that the success of the ceasefire depends on Israel's commitment and warned that any violations by Israel could jeopardize the process. The agreement is described as a result of the Palestinian people's steadfastness and resistance against what Hamas refers to as 'Zionist terror'. Abu Ubaida, on behalf of Hamas and other resistance factions, declared their full commitment to the ceasefire agreement.
View original story
Increased diplomatic tensions • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Military escalation • 25%
New ceasefire agreement • 25%
United States • 25%
Other • 25%
European Union • 25%
United Nations • 25%
UN-led intervention • 25%
Other international intervention • 25%
No international intervention • 25%
NATO-led intervention • 25%
US-led negotiations • 25%
No significant international involvement • 25%
EU mediation • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Widespread support • 25%
Widespread criticism • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
No significant response from the UN • 25%
UN issues a resolution condemning the ceasefire • 25%
UN issues a resolution supporting the ceasefire • 25%
Mixed responses from international community • 25%
US issues critical response • 25%
EU supports but with caution • 25%
Mixed international reactions • 25%
UN supports and praises agreement • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Broad support • 25%
Indifference • 25%
Predominantly negative • 25%
Negative response • 25%
No official response • 25%
Mixed response • 25%
Positive response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Broad support • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Negative criticism • 25%
No official response • 25%
Positive endorsement • 25%
High involvement • 25%
No involvement • 25%
Low involvement • 25%
Moderate involvement • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Hamas actions • 25%
Israeli actions • 25%
External influences • 25%