Loading...
Market
Major Texas hospital policy change on abortion services by end of 2024
5
Resolution / Starting Odds
More restrictive • 33%
Less restrictive • 33%
No change • 33%
Official announcements from major Texas hospitals
Story
Texas Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Major Challenge to New Abortion Laws on Friday
May 31, 2024, 02:29 PM
The Texas Supreme Court has unanimously rejected the most significant challenge to Texas’ new abortion laws. In the case of State v. Zurawski, the court ruled that the doctor involved has standing to challenge the Human Life Protection Act (HLPA). However, the court sided with the state, declaring that the HLPA is constitutional. The court also refused to ensure that doctors are not prosecuted for performing abortions they believe are necessary in medically complicated pregnancies. This ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by 22 patients and physicians, including 20 women, who argued that they were denied medically necessary abortions. The court held that the medical exceptions in the law were broad enough to withstand constitutional scrutiny. The ruling was issued on Friday by Texas' highest court.
View original story
Similar markets
No Change • 34%
Minor Amendments • 33%
Significant Reform • 33%
Increase in support services • 25%
Closure or reduction of services • 25%
Legal actions taken • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Strongly Support • 25%
Somewhat Support • 25%
Somewhat Oppose • 25%
Strongly Oppose • 25%
Majority support current law • 33%
Majority support partial amendment • 33%
Majority support full repeal • 33%
Ban upheld • 33%
Ban partially overturned • 33%
Ban fully overturned • 33%
Support current law • 33%
Support partial amendment • 33%
Support full repeal • 33%
Significant increase in services • 25%
Moderate increase in services • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Decrease in services • 25%
Uphold current restrictions • 25%
Loosen restrictions • 25%
Tighten restrictions • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Nationwide ban • 25%
Increased restrictions • 25%
No change • 25%
Expanded access • 25%
Pro-life groups • 33%
Pro-choice groups • 33%
Medical associations • 34%