Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitInternational response to U.S. Panama Canal threats by May 31, 2025?
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Support from allies • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Other diplomatic actions • 25%
Statements or actions from international bodies or major countries reported by credible news outlets
IMO Chief Arsenio Domínguez Affirms Panama Canal's Panamanian Control Amid Trump's Military Threats
Jan 14, 2025, 07:40 PM
The Panama Canal will remain under Panamanian control, according to Arsenio Domínguez, the Secretary-General of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Domínguez, a Panamanian national, made these remarks in response to statements from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who has not ruled out using military force to seize the canal. Domínguez emphasized that the treaties signed in 1977 clearly established that the canal would be operated by Panama, and this status would continue. Trump's comments came after he expressed a desire to retake control of the canal if toll prices for U.S. ships were not reduced. Trump is set to be inaugurated on January 20. The canal, which was opened in 1914 and transferred to Panama in 1999, remains a vital waterway.
View original story
Support for U.S. • 25%
Condemnation of U.S. • 25%
No official response • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Opposed • 25%
No official statement • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Opposed • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Opposition to U.S. demands • 25%
Support for U.S. demands • 25%
ALBA • 25%
United Nations • 25%
Organization of American States • 25%
Other • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Other • 25%
Other response • 25%
Panama reduces fees • 25%
Panama maintains current fees • 25%
Panama increases fees • 25%
Opposed • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
Military escalation • 25%
Military presence increase • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Condemnation of U.S. • 25%
Support for U.S. • 25%
Call for negotiations • 25%
Other diplomatic action • 25%
Rejection • 25%
No official response • 25%
Negotiation • 25%
No changes • 25%
Operational changes • 25%
Other significant impacts • 25%
Governance changes • 25%