Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow will major global powers interpret ICJ opinion on Israel's aid obligations within 6 months of release?
Supportive of Israel • 25%
Critical of Israel • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Official statements from governments or international bodies
UN General Assembly, Backed by 137 Countries, Seeks ICJ Opinion on Israel's Aid Obligations to Palestinians Following Norway's Proposal
Dec 19, 2024, 06:44 PM
The United Nations General Assembly has voted to request an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding Israel's obligations to facilitate humanitarian aid to Palestinians. The resolution, backed by 137 countries with 12 against and 22 abstentions, seeks to assess Israel's duties in relation to aid delivered by international groups, including the UN, and states. The move comes amid accusations that Israel has been obstructing aid to Gaza. The resolution was proposed by Norway and co-sponsored by several countries including Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. It calls for Israel to ensure the unhindered provision of essential supplies to the Palestinian civilian population and to cease actions that impede the delivery of humanitarian aid, particularly in Gaza. Norway's deputy foreign minister Andreas Kravik emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating that the international community has not been able to respond adequately due to lack of collaboration from Israel. The resolution also underscores the vital role of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) and calls upon Israel to uphold the Palestinian people's right to self-determination.
View original story
Against Israel • 25%
No resolution by end of 2025 • 25%
In favor of Israel • 25%
Case dismissed • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Support ICC decision • 25%
Condemn ICC decision • 25%
Warrants overturned • 25%
Jurisdiction not recognized • 25%
Case postponed • 25%
Warrants upheld • 25%
Appeal unsuccessful, warrants upheld • 25%
No decision by end of 2024 • 25%
Appeal partially successful, conditions modified • 25%
Appeal successful, warrants revoked • 25%
Criticism of U.S. actions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Increased support for U.S. stance • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No significant action • 25%
Diplomatic condemnation only • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic Measures • 25%
No Action • 25%
Majority oppose ICC actions • 25%
Mixed responses, no clear majority • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Majority support ICC actions • 25%
No change in aid • 25%
Aid redirected • 25%
Decrease in aid • 25%
Increase in aid • 25%