Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the international response to Israel's rule changes post-October 7 by end of 2025?
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic condemnation only • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Official statements from international bodies such as the UN, EU, or other relevant organizations
Israel Altered Rules of Engagement Post-October 7, Allowing Up to 20 Civilian Casualties Per Airstrike
Dec 26, 2024, 02:07 PM
Israel significantly altered its military rules of engagement following Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, according to a New York Times investigation. The changes allowed mid-ranking officers to approve airstrikes that could risk the lives of up to 20 civilians per attack, a sharp increase from the previous limits of up to five, and rarely ten, civilian casualties. This shift enabled the targeting of Hamas fighters even when they were at home surrounded by family and neighbors, rather than only when they were alone outside. The investigation, which reviewed military documents and interviewed over 100 soldiers and officials, found that Israel's military leadership believed the country faced an existential threat, prompting the change in rules. In the first seven weeks of the war, Israel fired nearly 30,000 munitions into Gaza, more than in the next eight months combined. The report also highlighted that the Israeli military often relied on flawed methods for identifying targets and assessing civilian risks, ignored warnings from its own ranks and U.S. officials, and failed to conduct thorough post-strike reviews or punish officers for wrongdoing. The military acknowledged the change in rules but maintained that it adhered to the rule of law.
View original story
UN sanctions • 25%
No major response • 25%
US support • 25%
EU condemnation • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Calls for negotiation • 25%
Support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
EU condemnation • 25%
UN sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
US support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
No Action • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic Measures • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Condemnation without action • 25%
No change • 25%
Increased restrictions • 25%
Minor adjustments • 25%
Significant policy changes • 25%
Support from key allies • 25%
Condemnation by multiple countries • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
No response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Support • 25%
Strong condemnation • 25%
Mild criticism • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Supportive stance • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Increased limits • 25%
Other changes • 25%
No change • 25%
Decreased limits • 25%