Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitElon Musk's response to the Supreme Court decision on his Twitter usage
Accepts decision without public objection • 25%
Criticizes the decision publicly • 25%
Attempts to modify the agreement • 25%
Takes other legal actions • 25%
Public statements, tweets from Elon Musk, and media coverage.
Supreme Court Upholds 'Twitter Sitter' SEC Settlement on Musk's Tesla Tweets
Apr 29, 2024, 02:36 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Elon Musk, often referred to as the 'Twitter sitter' case, against a securities fraud settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This agreement, which arose from Musk's 2018 'funding secured' tweet suggesting he had financing to take Tesla private, mandates that his Tesla-related tweets be pre-approved by an in-house lawyer. The decision ensures that the original settlement, aimed at preventing misleading communications, remains in effect.
View original story
Publicly accepts the verdict • 25%
Claims the trial was unfair • 25%
Appeals the verdict • 25%
Makes no public comment • 25%
Recusal from specific cases • 25%
Public statement addressing issues • 25%
Resignation from the Supreme Court • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Coinbase appeals the decision • 25%
Coinbase adjusts business practices • 25%
Coinbase seeks further legal action • 25%
Coinbase complies without contest • 25%
No significant changes • 33%
Software update announced • 33%
Hardware recall announced • 33%
Supportive of SpaceX • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Critical of SpaceX • 25%
No Public Response • 25%
Support recusal • 25%
Oppose recusal • 25%
Neutral/No comment • 25%
Call for resignation • 25%
Positive market reaction • 33%
Neutral market reaction • 34%
Negative market reaction • 33%
Musk continues as CEO • 25%
Musk steps down as CEO • 25%
Musk takes a new role • 25%
No change in leadership roles • 25%
Support from major investors • 33%
Neutral response from major investors • 34%
Opposition from major investors • 33%
No further legal action • 33%
Files new appeal • 33%
Counter-sues SEC • 33%
Apple appeals the decision • 33%
Apple accepts the ruling without appeal • 33%
Apple negotiates a settlement • 34%
More defiant against regulatory oversight • 34%
More cautious in communications • 33%
No noticeable change • 33%