Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitAfD's Stance on Surveillance Policies Post-Court Ruling
Stronger Opposition to Surveillance • 33%
Support for Certain Surveillance Measures • 33%
No Change in Stance • 34%
Official party statements, legislative proposals
German Court Upholds Extremist Classification for AfD, Allows Continued Surveillance
May 13, 2024, 09:10 AM
A German high court has upheld the classification of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a potential extremist group, allowing domestic security services to continue surveillance. This decision confirms the intelligence agency's right to monitor the AfD, which is considered a threat to democracy. The ruling supports the ongoing scrutiny and investigation of the party's members as suspected extremists.
View original story
Support surveillance measures • 25%
Oppose surveillance measures • 25%
Propose stricter regulations • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Reduction in activities • 33%
Expansion in activities • 33%
No significant change in activities • 34%
Increase in votes • 33%
Decrease in votes • 33%
No significant change • 34%
No change in policies • 33%
Moderate changes in policies • 33%
Significant changes in policies • 34%
Strengthening anti-terrorism laws • 33%
No major changes to legislation • 33%
Public reassurance without legislative changes • 34%
Increase in vote share • 33%
Decrease in vote share • 33%
No significant change in vote share • 34%
New anti-terrorism legislation • 25%
Increased funding for anti-terrorism units • 25%
Public awareness campaigns • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Introduce more moderate policies • 25%
Maintain current policies • 25%
Adopt more extreme policies • 25%
Significant restructuring of party platform • 25%
More negative • 33%
More positive • 33%
No significant change • 34%
Increase in surveillance-related complaints • 25%
Legal victories upholding new surveillance • 25%
Legal setbacks challenging surveillance • 25%
No significant impact on cases • 25%
Ban on anti-Islam rallies • 33%
Increased police presence • 33%
No major changes • 34%
Leadership Change • 50%
No Leadership Change • 50%
Increase in Protests • 50%
No Increase in Protests • 50%
Increase in Membership • 33%
Decrease in Membership • 33%
No Significant Change • 34%