Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWill Congress find systemic bias within FEMA by June 30, 2025?
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Official reports or statements from the Congressional investigation committees
FEMA Chief Faces Congress Over Claims of Skipping Trump Supporters in Helene and Milton Relief Efforts
Nov 19, 2024, 03:27 PM
FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell testified before two House committees to address allegations of political bias within the agency's disaster relief efforts following Hurricanes Helene and Milton, which caused over 230 deaths across the Southeast. The controversy arose after reports, initially uncovered by The Daily Wire, alleged that a former FEMA employee, Marn'i Washington, instructed relief workers to bypass homes displaying support for President Donald Trump. Washington, who was subsequently fired, claims she was following directives from her superiors and that such instructions included avoiding communities labeled as 'political hostile territory' by the Biden administration. Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Sam Graves, Rep. James Comer, and Rep. Scott Perry, are demanding accountability and have called for an investigation into possible systemic bias. Criswell condemned the employee's actions, stating, "I do not believe that this employee's actions are indicative of any widespread cultural problems at FEMA," and committed to requesting an inspector general investigation. The hearings, conducted by the House Oversight and Transportation Committees, aim to ensure that FEMA returns to its core mission of delivering disaster relief impartially to all Americans in need.
View original story
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No bias found • 25%
Bias found, no action recommended • 25%
Bias found, action recommended • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Bias confirmed • 25%
No bias found • 25%
Inconclusive findings • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Denies allegations • 25%
Acknowledges but denies wrongdoing • 25%
Acknowledges and promises changes • 25%
No official response • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Internal review conducted • 25%
Policy changes implemented • 25%
Other response • 25%
Policy change announced • 25%
No policy change • 25%
Policy review initiated • 25%
Policy change rejected • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
No action recommended • 25%
Increased oversight • 25%
Leadership changes • 25%
Isolated incidents found • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No bias found • 25%
Systemic bias found • 25%