Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWill Apple change its mineral supply chain practices due to the DRC lawsuit by end of 2025?
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Official statements or reports from Apple about changes in supply chain practices
Congo Accuses Apple Subsidiaries of War Crimes and Deceptive Practices Over Conflict Minerals
Dec 17, 2024, 08:38 AM
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has filed criminal complaints against Apple subsidiaries in France and Belgium, namely Apple France, Apple Retail France, and Apple Retail Belgium, accusing the tech giant of using conflict minerals in its supply chain. These minerals, including tin, tantalum, and tungsten (3T minerals), are sourced from conflict-ridden regions in the DRC where armed groups fund violence through illegal mining. The complaints allege that Apple benefits from minerals laundered through international supply chains, making the company complicit in war crimes, laundering of tainted minerals, and deceptive commercial practices. Apple maintains that it does not directly source raw minerals and conducts audits to ensure its supply chain does not finance armed groups. However, Congo's lawyers argue that Apple's reliance on the ITSCI monitoring scheme, which has been discredited for inadequate traceability by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), allows the company to falsely present its supply chain as clean. The legal action highlights the ongoing conflict in eastern Congo, fueled by competition for mineral resources, and marks the first time the Congolese state has directly targeted a major tech company in court. Belgium's colonial past and Rwanda's involvement in the conflict are also cited as reasons for the complaints.
View original story
Implement stricter supply chain audits • 25%
Publicly deny allegations • 25%
Increase transparency reports • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Fines imposed • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Reduce prices • 25%
Enhance services • 25%
No changes • 25%
Legal appeal • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No Changes • 25%
Significant New Regulations • 25%
Regulations Relaxed • 25%
Minor Adjustments • 25%
Case Dismissed • 25%
Settlement • 25%
Guilty • 25%
Not Guilty • 25%