Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the legal case against Apple subsidiaries in Belgium by end of 2025?
Guilty • 25%
Not Guilty • 25%
Settlement • 25%
Case Dismissed • 25%
Court rulings or settlements in Belgium
Congo Accuses Apple Subsidiaries of War Crimes and Deceptive Practices Over Conflict Minerals
Dec 17, 2024, 08:38 AM
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has filed criminal complaints against Apple subsidiaries in France and Belgium, namely Apple France, Apple Retail France, and Apple Retail Belgium, accusing the tech giant of using conflict minerals in its supply chain. These minerals, including tin, tantalum, and tungsten (3T minerals), are sourced from conflict-ridden regions in the DRC where armed groups fund violence through illegal mining. The complaints allege that Apple benefits from minerals laundered through international supply chains, making the company complicit in war crimes, laundering of tainted minerals, and deceptive commercial practices. Apple maintains that it does not directly source raw minerals and conducts audits to ensure its supply chain does not finance armed groups. However, Congo's lawyers argue that Apple's reliance on the ITSCI monitoring scheme, which has been discredited for inadequate traceability by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), allows the company to falsely present its supply chain as clean. The legal action highlights the ongoing conflict in eastern Congo, fueled by competition for mineral resources, and marks the first time the Congolese state has directly targeted a major tech company in court. Belgium's colonial past and Rwanda's involvement in the conflict are also cited as reasons for the complaints.
View original story
Fines imposed • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Ruling upheld • 25%
Appeal withdrawn • 25%
Ruling overturned • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Settlement reached • 34%
Ruling overturned • 33%
Ruling upheld • 33%
Apple opposes Google • 25%
Apple supports Google • 25%
Apple withdraws from case • 25%
Apple remains neutral • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Case dismissed • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Amar Bhakta wins • 25%
Apple wins • 25%
Case dismissed • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Plaintiff wins • 25%
Apple wins • 25%
No change • 25%
Minor adjustments • 25%
Policy overhaul • 25%
Increased transparency • 25%
Case settled with other terms • 25%
Google's remedies accepted • 25%
Chrome sale required • 25%
Case ongoing • 25%
Google's proposal accepted • 25%
DOJ's proposal accepted • 25%
Compromise solution • 25%
Case unresolved • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No Changes • 25%
Significant New Regulations • 25%
Regulations Relaxed • 25%
Minor Adjustments • 25%