Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWho will be held most accountable for the failure to prevent the August 15 settler attack?
IDF • 25%
Shin Bet • 25%
Israeli Government • 25%
No one held accountable • 25%
Official investigations and reports
IDF Admits Failure in Preventing August 15 Settler Attack by 100 in West Bank
Aug 28, 2024, 05:17 PM
The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have released the findings of an investigation into a violent attack by Israeli settlers on the Palestinian village of Jit in the West Bank on August 15. The attack, which involved around 100 settlers, was described by IDF Central Commander Maj. Gen. Avi Bluth as the worst Jewish terror event ever. The investigation revealed that the Shin Bet had provided prior intelligence warning of potential nationalistic violence, but the IDF and police failed to act decisively to prevent the incident. The first troops at the scene did not respond as expected, leading to the dismissal of two IDF members. The attack resulted in the death of one Palestinian, and the IDF has acknowledged its failure to protect civilians, amid growing international pressure on Israel to address such violence.
View original story
Ronald Rowe • 25%
Local law enforcement • 25%
Secret Service counter-sniper teams • 25%
Other • 25%
Protest organizers • 25%
Individual protesters • 25%
No one held responsible • 25%
Other • 25%
Local IDF commanders • 25%
Higher-ranking IDF officials • 25%
No one held accountable • 25%
Combination of local and higher-ranking officials • 25%
Lone wolf attacker • 25%
Hamas • 25%
Islamic Jihad • 25%
Other group • 25%
Secret Service leadership • 25%
Local law enforcement • 25%
Event organizers • 25%
No one held accountable • 25%
Secret Service leadership • 25%
Local law enforcement • 25%
Event organizers • 25%
No one held accountable • 25%
Benjamin Netanyahu • 25%
Itamar Ben-Gvir • 25%
Yoav Gallant • 25%
Other official • 25%
Arrests made • 25%
No arrests but official condemnation • 25%
No arrests and no official condemnation • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Reprimands issued • 25%
Resignations • 25%
Other • 25%
Intelligence failure • 25%
Command failure • 25%
Operational failure • 25%
Other • 25%
All responsible captured/eliminated • 25%
Most responsible captured/eliminated • 25%
Some responsible captured/eliminated • 25%
None responsible captured/eliminated • 25%
New policies or measures implemented • 25%
Public apology or acknowledgment • 25%
No significant action taken • 25%
Further investigations commissioned • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
New legislation passed • 25%
Other • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%