Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the Trump administration's response to the UN by January 31, 2025?
Diplomatic Protest • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
Reduction in UN Funding • 25%
No Action • 25%
Official U.S. government statements or actions, or credible news sources
Trump's National Security Advisor Promises Strong Response to ICC, UN Bias in January
Nov 21, 2024, 01:42 PM
President-elect Donald Trump's incoming National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, has indicated that the administration will take a firm stance against the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United Nations (UN) in response to what he describes as their 'antisemitic bias.' This statement follows the ICC's issuance of an arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Waltz emphasized that the ICC lacks credibility and that allegations against Israel have been refuted by the U.S. government, asserting Israel's lawful defense against 'genocidal terrorists.' He warned that a strong response from the Trump administration can be expected in January.
View original story
Increased security measures • 25%
Public condemnation • 25%
Legislative action • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No official response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Strong condemnation • 25%
Mild criticism • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Supportive stance • 25%
Diplomatic condemnation • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Reduction in military aid • 25%
No significant action • 25%
EU sanctions • 25%
UN resolutions • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Military action • 25%
Increased negotiations • 25%
No significant change in approach • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Critical • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Support U.S. stance • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Oppose U.S. stance • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Antisemitic Bias • 25%
Other • 25%
Support for Israel • 25%
Lack of Credibility • 25%