Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the primary reason cited by Nebraska state senators for not supporting the special session?
Political Strategy • 25%
Constituent Pressure • 25%
Legal Concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Public statements or official records from Nebraska state senators
Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen Will Not Call Special Session to Change Electoral Vote Allocation, Dealing Blow to Trump
Sep 24, 2024, 05:11 PM
Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen has announced that he will not call a special legislative session to change the way the state allocates its electoral votes to a winner-take-all system. This decision, made on Tuesday, effectively ends an effort led by Donald Trump and the Republicans to modify the electoral vote allocation before November. Pillen cited the inability to persuade 33 state senators as a key reason for not moving forward with the special session. This development is seen as a significant setback for Trump and his supporters who hoped the change could tilt the Electoral College in his favor.
View original story
Human rights concerns • 25%
Due process issues • 25%
Discrimination against immigrants • 25%
Other • 25%
Election integrity concerns • 25%
Immigration-related issues • 25%
Constitutional concerns • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Political Implications • 25%
Budget Constraints • 25%
Lack of Bipartisan Support • 25%
Other • 25%
Excessive executive power • 25%
Impact on nonprofits • 25%
Lack of due process • 25%
Other • 25%
Economic impact • 25%
Diplomatic relations with China • 25%
Civil liberties concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Gender-affirming care provision • 25%
Critical Race Theory ban • 25%
Defense spending amount • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Federal overreach • 25%
Unnecessary regulation • 25%
Partisan motivations • 25%
Other • 25%
Civil liberties concerns • 25%
Expansion of executive power • 25%
Lack of due process • 25%
Other • 25%
Threat to civil liberties • 25%
Potential misuse of power • 25%
Lack of due process • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
National Security • 25%
Economic Impact • 25%
Human Rights • 25%
Other • 25%
Immigration Provisions • 25%
Spending Levels • 25%
Specific Allocations • 25%
Other • 25%
Budget Concerns • 25%
Political Pressure • 25%
Program Feasibility • 25%
Other • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Republican Party • 33%
Democratic Party • 33%
Other • 33%