Loading...
Market
What will be the primary reason cited for opposition to H.R. 9495 by February 28, 2025?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
Threat to civil liberties • 25%
Potential misuse of power • 25%
Lack of due process • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Statements from major nonprofit organizations or coalition letters
Story
House Bill H.R. 9495 Could Allow Trump to Target Nonprofits, Including Planned Parenthood, Faces Opposition from 130 Organizations
Nov 18, 2024, 02:29 PM
New legislation, specifically H.R. 9495, has been introduced in the House, which could enable the Trump administration to revoke the tax-exempt status of nonprofits. This bill has drawn significant opposition, with over 130 civil liberties organizations expressing concerns that it would allow any administration to target nonprofits without due process. Critics argue that this represents an expansion of executive power, with implications for organizations like Planned Parenthood. Proponents of the bill assert that it aims to investigate nonprofits allegedly abusing their status to fund terrorist organizations, a claim that has been met with skepticism regarding its potential misuse against various nonprofit entities.
View original story
Similar markets
Economic impact on US farmers • 25%
Violation of free market principles • 25%
Diplomatic repercussions • 25%
Constitutional concerns • 25%
Civil liberties concerns • 25%
Expansion of executive power • 25%
Lack of due process • 25%
Other • 25%
Human rights concerns • 25%
Due process issues • 25%
Discrimination against immigrants • 25%
Other • 25%
National Security • 25%
Economic Impact • 25%
Human Rights • 25%
Other • 25%
Gender-affirming care provision • 25%
Critical Race Theory ban • 25%
Defense spending amount • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Excessive executive power • 25%
Impact on nonprofits • 25%
Lack of due process • 25%
Other • 25%
Democratic Senators • 25%
Republican Senators • 25%
Agricultural lobby groups • 25%
Foreign governments • 25%
Excessive spending • 25%
Lack of transparency • 25%
Political strategy • 25%
Other • 25%
Immigration Provisions • 25%
Spending Levels • 25%
Specific Allocations • 25%
Other • 25%
Economic impact • 25%
Diplomatic relations with China • 25%
Civil liberties concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Humanitarian concerns • 25%
Legal/constitutional issues • 25%
Economic impact • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Evenly divided • 25%
No clear opinion • 25%