Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the legal case against Apple subsidiaries in France by end of 2025?
Guilty • 25%
Not Guilty • 25%
Settlement • 25%
Case Dismissed • 25%
Court rulings or settlements in France
Congo Accuses Apple Subsidiaries of War Crimes and Deceptive Practices Over Conflict Minerals
Dec 17, 2024, 08:38 AM
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has filed criminal complaints against Apple subsidiaries in France and Belgium, namely Apple France, Apple Retail France, and Apple Retail Belgium, accusing the tech giant of using conflict minerals in its supply chain. These minerals, including tin, tantalum, and tungsten (3T minerals), are sourced from conflict-ridden regions in the DRC where armed groups fund violence through illegal mining. The complaints allege that Apple benefits from minerals laundered through international supply chains, making the company complicit in war crimes, laundering of tainted minerals, and deceptive commercial practices. Apple maintains that it does not directly source raw minerals and conducts audits to ensure its supply chain does not finance armed groups. However, Congo's lawyers argue that Apple's reliance on the ITSCI monitoring scheme, which has been discredited for inadequate traceability by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), allows the company to falsely present its supply chain as clean. The legal action highlights the ongoing conflict in eastern Congo, fueled by competition for mineral resources, and marks the first time the Congolese state has directly targeted a major tech company in court. Belgium's colonial past and Rwanda's involvement in the conflict are also cited as reasons for the complaints.
View original story
Apple wins the appeal • 25%
Apple loses the appeal • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Case dismissed • 25%
Apple wins • 25%
Apple loses • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Case ongoing • 25%
Fine reduced • 25%
Fine upheld • 25%
Fine increased • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Appeal successful • 33%
Appeal unsuccessful • 33%
Settlement reached • 33%
Fine imposed • 25%
No fine • 25%
Appeal in progress • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
No new investigations • 25%
Investigation with no action • 25%
Investigation with fines • 25%
Investigation with policy changes • 25%
Fine upheld • 25%
Fine reduced • 25%
Fine overturned • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
New tax dispute • 25%
Antitrust case • 25%
Privacy violation case • 25%
Other • 25%
Guilty of monopolizing • 25%
Not guilty • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Other • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Settled • 25%
Apple loses • 25%
Apple complies without fines • 25%
Apple complies with fines • 25%
Apple does not comply and faces fines • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Settled • 25%
Apple found guilty • 25%
Apple found not guilty • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No Changes • 25%
Significant New Regulations • 25%
Regulations Relaxed • 25%
Minor Adjustments • 25%