Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of Congressional hearing on DOGE Committee's proposals by end of 2025?
Proposals accepted • 25%
Proposals rejected • 25%
Proposals partially accepted • 25%
No decision made • 25%
Official records or announcements regarding Congressional hearings
Trump Appoints Musk, Ramaswamy to Lead DOGE, Aiming $2 Trillion Cuts by July 2026
Dec 9, 2024, 02:25 AM
President-elect Donald Trump has appointed Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The initiative aims to address the United States' $36 trillion national debt by cutting $2 trillion in government spending. DOGE's mission includes reducing waste, fraud, and abuse in government operations, as well as redesigning inefficient systems such as procurement processes and taxpayer spending. The committee, also referred to as Trump’s DOGE Committee, will operate publicly as required by law and plans to provide recommendations to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) by July 2026. However, DOGE currently lacks funding and will rely on private contributions to commission GAO reports and conduct fact-finding missions. Advocates argue that Congress must take the initiative seriously for it to succeed in reshaping the nation's fiscal trajectory.
View original story
Full support and implementation • 25%
Partial support and implementation • 25%
Rejection of proposals • 25%
Indefinite postponement • 25%
Significant cost savings • 25%
Public sector job cuts • 25%
Increased efficiency with no job loss • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Passed • 25%
Failed • 25%
Postponed • 25%
Withdrawn • 25%
Plan fully implemented • 25%
Partially implemented • 25%
Plan abandoned • 25%
Implementation ongoing • 25%
Pass with majority • 33%
Fail with majority • 33%
Tied vote • 34%
Agency Reduction • 25%
Spending Cuts • 25%
Regulatory Reform • 25%
Other • 25%
Full support from GOP leaders • 25%
Partial support with conditions • 25%
Rejection by GOP leaders • 25%
No formal decision made • 25%
Highly favorable • 25%
Moderately favorable • 25%
Moderately unfavorable • 25%
Highly unfavorable • 25%
Waste reduction • 25%
Taxpayer spending optimization • 25%
Procurement process redesign • 25%
Fraud prevention • 25%