Loading...
Market
What will be the outcome of the DOGE plan by end of 2025?
2
Elon Musk•Vivek Ramaswamy•Donald Trump•Department of Government Efficiency•DOGE•Save America•Capitol Hill•House•Mike Johnson•Musk•Senate•John Thune•Susan Collins
Resolution / Starting Odds
Plan fully implemented • 25%
Partially implemented • 25%
Plan abandoned • 25%
Implementation ongoing • 25%
Official government reports and analyses on the implementation of the DOGE plan
Story
Musk and Ramaswamy Unveil DOGE Plan to Cut $2 Trillion, Reduce Agencies to 99
Dec 5, 2024, 04:26 PM
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, appointed by President Donald Trump to lead the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as part of his 'Save America' agenda, met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill to discuss plans to reduce government spending by as much as $2 trillion. Their ambitious proposal aims to slash the federal budget by reducing the number of government agencies from 428 to 99 and targeting waste, fraud, and abuse. "We want to take a blowtorch to the regulatory state," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, expressing strong support for their efforts. Musk emphasized the need for fiscal responsibility, stating, "I think we should be spending the public’s money wisely." The duo held meetings with key lawmakers, including incoming Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senator Susan Collins, who met with Musk for over an hour to discuss improving government efficiency. The initiative has garnered bipartisan interest as DOGE leaders seek to make government more effective and responsive.
View original story
Similar markets
Significant cost savings • 25%
Public sector job cuts • 25%
Increased efficiency with no job loss • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Increased efficiency • 25%
Reduced spending • 25%
Reduced regulations • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Budget Reduction • 25%
Regulatory Streamlining • 25%
Public Sector Innovation • 25%
Other • 25%
Significant efficiency improvement • 25%
Minimal changes • 25%
Negative impact on efficiency • 25%
Other • 25%
Cutting government waste • 25%
Eliminating regulations • 25%
Restructuring federal agencies • 25%
Other • 25%
Very effective • 25%
Somewhat effective • 25%
Not effective • 25%
Publicly criticized • 25%
Highly favorable • 25%
Moderately favorable • 25%
Moderately unfavorable • 25%
Highly unfavorable • 25%
Federal spending cuts • 25%
Regulation elimination • 25%
Agency restructuring • 25%
Other • 25%
Less than 30% • 25%
30% to 50% • 25%
50% to 70% • 25%
More than 70% • 25%
Healthcare • 25%
Infrastructure • 25%
Defense • 25%
Education • 25%