Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the main focus of Dutch media coverage on the CABR release by Q1 2025?
Historical Significance • 25%
Privacy Concerns • 25%
Legal Implications • 25%
Public Reactions • 25%
Analysis of major Dutch media outlets
Netherlands Publishes Names of 425,000 Suspected Nazi Collaborators from 32 Million Page Archive
Jan 2, 2025, 01:54 PM
The Netherlands has made public an online registry of nearly 425,000 individuals suspected of collaborating with the Nazis during World War II. This action follows the expiration of a law that previously restricted public access to the archive, known as the Central Archive of Special Jurisdiction (CABR), which spans 32 million pages. The archive includes names of mostly Dutch people investigated for collaboration with German occupiers. Only a fifth of those listed were ever prosecuted, with most cases involving minor offenses such as membership in the National Socialist movement. The full digital release of the archive's files has been postponed due to privacy concerns raised by the Dutch Data Protection Authority, with only the list of names currently available online. Researchers, descendants, journalists, and historians can request to view the complete files at the Dutch National Archives in The Hague.
View original story
Balanced coverage across topics • 25%
Focus on legal implications • 25%
Focus on political ramifications • 25%
Focus on Trump's response • 25%
Lab leak theory and origins • 25%
Public health policy failures • 25%
NIH's role and funding practices • 25%
Government cover-up allegations • 25%
Contested results • 25%
Routine process • 25%
Minor disruptions • 25%
Major disruptions • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Positive • 25%
Negative • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Focus on government accountability • 25%
Other focuses • 25%
Focus on public reaction • 25%
Focus on judicial process • 25%
Golubski's personal history • 25%
Community reactions • 25%
Systemic police issues • 25%
Focus on victims' stories • 25%
Print Media • 25%
Italian TV Network • 25%
International TV Network • 25%
Online News Platform • 25%
Focus on study criticism • 25%
Focus on health risks • 25%
Minimal coverage • 25%
Balanced reporting • 25%
Political implications • 25%
Human rights concerns • 25%
Diplomatic tensions • 25%
Forensic investigations • 25%
Impact on public trust • 25%
Legal implications • 25%
Corporate influence on media • 25%
Journalistic integrity • 25%
Certification process • 25%
Security measures • 25%
Public reactions • 25%
Historical comparisons • 25%
Hunting safety • 25%
Personal story of Harvey • 25%
Legal implications • 25%
Wildlife management • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
50,001 to 100,000 • 25%
More than 100,000 • 25%
Less than 10,000 • 25%
10,000 to 50,000 • 25%