Loading...
Market
What will be the international response to the manifesto's war crime claims by June 30, 2025?
2
Tesla Cybertruck explosion•Trump Hotel•Las Vegas•Sam Shoemate•Navy•Shawn Ryan•Afghanistan•China•Livelsberger•Special Forces•FBI
Resolution / Starting Odds
UN investigation launched • 25%
US government response only • 25%
No official response • 25%
Other • 25%
Statements from governments or international organizations
Story
Matthew Livelsberger's Manifesto Alleges Advanced Drone Tech Before Cybertruck Explosion at Trump Hotel Las Vegas on December 31st
Jan 3, 2025, 09:03 PM
Matthew A. Livelsberger, identified as the perpetrator of the Tesla Cybertruck explosion at Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, sent a manifesto to retired U.S. Army intelligence officer Sam Shoemate before the incident on December 31st. The manifesto, which was also shared with former Navy SEAL Shawn Ryan, alleges the use of advanced drone technology, U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan, and claims that China uses 'gravitic propulsion systems' in drones. Livelsberger, a Master Sergeant and former Special Forces soldier, stated in the email that he was being tracked by the FBI and mentioned possessing a 'massive VBIED [vehicle borne IED].' The explosion, described as a suicide attack, occurred on New Year's Eve, and the manifesto has been passed along to the FBI for further investigation.
View original story
Similar markets
No significant action • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic condemnation • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Condemnation of Russia • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Calls for ceasefire • 25%
Condemnation of Ukraine • 25%
No significant action taken • 25%
UN Peacekeeping mission deployed • 25%
Economic sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic interventions only • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Increased military aid to Ukraine • 25%
Increased sanctions on Russia • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Sanctions on Israel • 25%
Diplomatic pressure • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Condemn ICC decision • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Support ICC decision • 25%
Increased international scrutiny • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Condemnation from international bodies • 25%
Support for Colombia's efforts • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Imposition of sanctions • 25%
Condemnation of Hamas • 25%
Call for further investigation • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Humanitarian aid increase • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No resolution passed • 25%
Resolution passed condemning Israel • 25%
Resolution passed supporting Israel • 25%
Other significant action • 25%