Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the international community's response to the IDF's use of the Hannibal Directive by December 31, 2024?
Condemnation • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Other • 25%
Statements from international organizations like the UN or credible news sources
IDF's Use of Hannibal Directive During October 7 Hamas Attack Revealed, Leading to Civilian Deaths
Jul 7, 2024, 03:55 PM
An investigation by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz has revealed that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) invoked the controversial Hannibal Directive during the October 7 Hamas attack. The directive, which aims to prevent the capture of soldiers by enemy forces, was employed at three army facilities infiltrated by Hamas. This involved using lethal force to prevent soldiers from being taken captive, even at the risk of civilian lives. The Hannibal Directive led to the deaths of both Israeli soldiers and civilians, with orders to attack any vehicle returning to Gaza and to indiscriminately bomb the area with mortar shells and artillery. The directive's implementation included attacks on the Re’im outpost near the Nova festival, and the use of Apache helicopters and tanks, turning areas around Gaza into free-fire zones. The directive's implementation has sparked significant controversy and criticism, with many questioning the ethics and consequences of such a policy.
View original story
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
General support • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation of Israel • 25%
Calls for peace talks • 25%
Support for Israel • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation from multiple countries • 25%
Support from multiple countries • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Other • 25%
UN sanctions • 25%
EU sanctions • 25%
Condemnation without sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation from major international bodies • 25%
Support from major international bodies • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation from multiple countries • 25%
Support from multiple countries • 25%
Mixed international response • 25%
No significant international response • 25%
Condemnation and sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Limited response • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
General support • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Calls for investigation • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Calls for Further Investigation • 25%
No Official Response • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Other • 25%
Launches formal investigation • 25%
Implements policy changes • 25%
No action taken • 25%