Loading...
Market
What will be the impact of the settlement on the NCAA's amateurism model by the end of 2026?
3
Resolution / Starting Odds
Significant transformation • 33%
Moderate changes • 33%
Minimal impact • 33%
NCAA policy updates and sports law analysis
Story
NCAA and Power 5 Approve $2.8 Billion House v. NCAA Settlement, Introducing Revenue-Sharing
May 23, 2024, 11:56 PM
The NCAA and its five power conferences have agreed to a historic $2.8 billion settlement in the House v. NCAA antitrust case. This landmark decision, which will allow schools to directly pay athletes for the first time, marks a transformative shift in college sports. The settlement includes a multi-billion dollar revenue-sharing model where each school can share up to $20 million per year with its athletes, starting potentially by the fall of 2025. The Big 12, ACC, Big Ten, SEC, and Pac-12 have all approved the consolidated settlement, along with the NCAA Board of Governors. The settlement aims to resolve three major antitrust lawsuits and is expected to usher in significant changes to the NCAA's long-standing amateurism model. Judge Wilken will still need to certify the settlement. Jeffrey Kessler, the lead attorney, and NCAA President Charlie Baker have expressed optimism about the transformative impact of this settlement.
View original story
Similar markets
Significantly positive • 25%
Moderately positive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Negative • 25%
Major restructuring • 25%
Minor adjustments • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Dissolution of NCAA • 25%
Recognition of all athletes as employees • 20%
Increased health and safety standards • 20%
Improved transfer and NIL rights • 20%
Minimum wage for athletes • 20%
No significant changes • 20%
Increased Revenue Sharing • 33%
Reduction in Settlement Payments • 33%
Status Quo Maintained • 33%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Scholarship adjustments • 25%
Compensation for athletes • 25%
New governance structures • 25%
Revised eligibility rules • 25%
NCAA revises settlement terms • 33%
NCAA maintains current settlement terms • 33%
NCAA increases lobbying efforts • 33%
Acceptance • 33%
Legal challenge • 33%
Negotiate amendments • 34%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Increase in transparency and regulation • 33%
No significant change • 33%
Decrease in the value of NIL deals • 34%