Loading...
Market
Impact of NCAA settlement on organizational structure by end of 2025
4
Resolution / Starting Odds
Major restructuring • 25%
Minor adjustments • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Dissolution of NCAA • 25%
Analysis from sports economists or major sports news outlets
Story
Big 12 Unanimously Approves House v. NCAA Settlement Terms, First of Power 5
May 21, 2024, 05:22 PM
The Big 12 presidents and chancellors have unanimously voted to approve the settlement terms in the House v. NCAA lawsuit, marking a significant step toward resolving the case. This decision makes the Big 12 the first of the Power 5 conferences to authorize the settlement, with other conferences expected to vote in the coming days. The settlement could reshape college sports by moving towards a revenue-sharing model, addressing internal pushback within the NCAA ranks, and raising questions about the future of college athletics. The Big 12 leaders were briefed on the settlement’s 13-page term sheet. The NCAA Board of Governors is also expected to vote on the settlement terms.
View original story
Similar markets
Significantly positive • 25%
Moderately positive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Negative • 25%
Increased Revenue Sharing • 33%
Reduction in Settlement Payments • 33%
Status Quo Maintained • 33%
Significant transformation • 33%
Moderate changes • 33%
Minimal impact • 33%
Increase in funding • 33%
Decrease in funding • 33%
No significant change • 34%
NCAA revises settlement terms • 33%
NCAA maintains current settlement terms • 33%
NCAA increases lobbying efforts • 33%
Major adjustments • 33%
Minor adjustments • 33%
No adjustments • 34%
Significantly Improved • 25%
Somewhat Improved • 25%
No Change • 25%
Deteriorated • 25%
Significantly Positive • 25%
Slightly Positive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Negative • 25%
Increase in transparency and regulation • 33%
No significant change • 33%
Decrease in the value of NIL deals • 34%
Supportive • 33%
Neutral • 33%
Opposed • 33%