Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be Pam Bondi's stance on 2020 election integrity issues during her tenure by end of 2025?
Continues to support Trump's 2020 election claims • 25%
Shifts to a neutral stance • 25%
Denounces previous claims • 25%
Other • 25%
Public statements or official actions taken by Pam Bondi
Pam Bondi, Trump's AG Nominee, Dodges Question on 2020 Election Loss, Raising Concerns
Jan 15, 2025, 04:42 PM
During her confirmation hearing for the position of U.S. Attorney General, Pam Bondi, nominated by President-elect Donald Trump, repeatedly declined to explicitly state that Trump lost the 2020 presidential election. When questioned by Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Dick Durbin, Bondi acknowledged that Joe Biden is the current President of the United States and that there was a peaceful transition of power. However, she avoided directly confirming Trump's loss in 2020, instead mentioning Trump's 2024 election win and her observations of potential election irregularities in Pennsylvania during her time as an advocate for Trump's campaign. Bondi's responses raised concerns among Democratic senators about her independence from Trump and her commitment to the Constitution. Additionally, when asked by Sen. Alex Padilla if she would retract her previous statements that Trump won Pennsylvania in 2020, Bondi refused to do so.
View original story
Continued concerns on integrity • 25%
Strong support for 2020 results • 25%
Other stance • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Maintains current stance • 33%
Denies Trump's loss • 34%
Affirms Trump's loss • 33%
Remains neutral • 25%
No comment • 25%
Opposes investigations • 25%
Supports investigations • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Other • 25%
Withdrawn • 25%
Confirmed • 25%
Rejected • 25%
Reducing DOJ partisanship • 25%
Addressing cybercrime • 25%
Fighting organized crime • 25%
Other • 25%
No Data • 25%
Unchanged • 25%
Improved • 25%
Declined • 25%
Declined • 25%
Improved significantly • 25%
Improved slightly • 25%
No change • 25%
Criminal justice reform • 25%
Other • 25%
Addressing DOJ partisanship • 25%
Immigration enforcement • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increased trust in DOJ • 25%
Decreased trust in DOJ • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
Civil rights violations • 25%
Corporate fraud • 25%
Political corruption • 25%
Other • 25%
Political Investigations • 25%
Drug Enforcement • 25%
Human Trafficking • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Other • 25%
Strong opposition and legal challenges • 25%
Calls for oversight and accountability • 25%
Acceptance with minimal opposition • 25%