Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitPublic reaction to SC decision on NLRB authority?
Significant protests • 33%
Legislative actions • 33%
No major actions • 34%
News reports and public statements
Supreme Court Sides with Starbucks in 8-1 Decision, Impacting NLRB Authority in 'Memphis 7' Case
Jun 13, 2024, 03:52 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Starbucks in a significant labor dispute, making it more difficult for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to obtain court orders for the reinstatement of workers fired during unionization efforts. The case, Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, involved the firing of seven Memphis employees, known as the 'Memphis 7,' who were attempting to unionize in 2022. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion for the 8-1 majority, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson concurring in part and dissenting in part. The ruling mandates that district courts apply a traditional four-factor test when considering the NLRB's requests for preliminary injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act. This decision is seen as a setback for labor organizers and could have broader implications for the NLRB's authority in future labor disputes, impacting labor prosecutors' ability to win court injunctions against employers.
View original story
Predominantly positive • 33%
Predominantly negative • 33%
Mixed reactions • 34%
Supportive of SpaceX • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Critical of SpaceX • 25%
No Public Response • 25%
Predominantly supportive of the verdict • 33%
Predominantly against the verdict • 33%
Mixed reactions • 33%
Widespread outrage • 25%
General acceptance • 25%
Calls for legal reform • 25%
Indifference • 25%
Increased public support • 25%
Decreased public support • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Support from GOP figures • 25%
Criticism from GOP figures • 25%
Support from Democratic figures • 25%
Criticism from Democratic figures • 25%
Significantly Positive • 25%
No Significant Change • 25%
Significantly Negative • 25%
Mixed Reactions • 25%
Broadly positive • 33%
Mixed reactions • 33%
Broadly negative • 34%
Widespread criticism • 33%
Mixed reactions • 33%
Minimal attention • 33%
No significant protests • 33%
Minor protests • 33%
Major protests • 34%
Mostly positive • 33%
Mostly negative • 33%
Mixed/Neutral • 33%
Legislative changes • 33%
Public awareness campaigns • 33%
No significant public response • 33%