Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitOutcome of investigation into NOAA and Met Office data manipulation by end of 2024
Data manipulation confirmed • 33%
Data manipulation not confirmed • 33%
Investigation inconclusive • 34%
Official investigation reports or credible news sources
NOAA and Met Office Accused of Manipulating Temperature Data to Exaggerate Global Warming
May 25, 2024, 12:07 PM
Concerns are growing over allegations that both the US and UK government agencies have manipulated historical temperature data to exaggerate global warming trends. In the US, accusations are directed at NOAA and USHCN, with claims that data tampering has created an artificial warming trend in Missouri, recorded by 248 thermometers, and erased the heat of 1911. In Ohio, it is noted that 89% of days over 100F, recorded on 1,511 occasions, occurred before 1970, suggesting past summers were hotter when atmospheric CO2 levels were lower. Similarly, the UK's Met Office is accused of altering historic temperature records, a practice allegedly planned in the leaked 'Climategate' emails. These actions have led to widespread skepticism about the authenticity of climate change data.
View original story
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No manipulation found • 33%
Minor errors but no deliberate manipulation • 33%
Deliberate manipulation confirmed • 33%
Support the accused institutions • 25%
Neutral or no clear position • 25%
Criticism of the accused institutions • 25%
Call for broader investigations • 25%
No violations found • 33%
Minor violations found • 33%
Major violations found • 34%
No violation found • 33%
Minor violations found • 33%
Major violations found • 33%
Significant decrease in trust • 25%
Moderate decrease in trust • 25%
No significant change in trust • 25%
Increase in trust • 25%
No violations found • 33%
Minor violations found • 33%
Major violations found • 34%
No evidence found • 33%
Evidence of price fixing found • 33%
Inconclusive results • 34%
Charges filed • 33%
Settlement reached • 33%
Case dismissed • 34%
Investigation finds wrongdoing • 33%
Investigation finds no wrongdoing • 33%
Investigation inconclusive • 34%
No significant changes • 25%
Major policy overhaul • 25%
Leadership changes • 25%
Both policy and leadership changes • 25%