Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitOutcome of Florida's investigation into FEMA by July 31, 2025
Misconduct confirmed • 25%
No misconduct found • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Official announcement from the Florida Governor's office or state investigation report
FEMA Chief Denies Skipping Trump Homes After Hurricanes Milton, Helene; Will Seek Investigation
Nov 19, 2024, 03:27 PM
FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell testified before Congress to address allegations that agency employees were instructed to avoid providing disaster relief to homes displaying signs supporting President-elect Donald Trump. The controversy arose after reports surfaced that FEMA workers were told to bypass such homes during relief efforts following Hurricanes Milton and Helene. Criswell denied any such policy, stating, "There is nothing in our policies and our procedures that would direct any employee to bypass anybody's home based on their political party." She indicated she would welcome an independent investigation by the inspector general into the claims. The administrator also mentioned that a different team had been sent to the homes that were skipped, and the employee involved had been fired. Meanwhile, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis launched an investigation into the allegations. Lawmakers, including Rep. Mark Green and Rep. Scott Perry, expressed concern over the reports and are demanding interviews with FEMA employees. An ex-FEMA employee, Marn'i Washington, who was fired over the incident, claimed she was "framed" and that the order to avoid certain houses came from her direct superior based on previous team encounters.
View original story
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Isolated incident confirmed • 25%
Systemic issues identified • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Internal reforms recommended • 25%
Formal charges filed • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
FEMA cleared of wrongdoing • 25%
FEMA found guilty of misconduct • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No bias found • 25%
Bias found, no further action • 25%
Bias found, policy changes recommended • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Minor procedural errors found • 25%
Significant misconduct found • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Evidence of Bias Found • 25%
No Evidence Found • 25%
Inconclusive Results • 25%
Investigation Incomplete • 25%
No significant issues found • 25%
Issues found with federal response • 25%
Issues found with state response • 25%
Issues found with both responses • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Investigation initiated • 25%
No investigation • 25%
Investigation concluded with findings • 25%
Investigation concluded with no findings • 25%
No further action • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
Disciplinary actions • 25%
Legal proceedings • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No action • 25%
New legislation • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Hearings scheduled • 25%