Who will be the main critic of CNN's Clarissa Ward report by February 28, 2025?
Syrian government • 25%
International media • 25%
Human rights organizations • 25%
Independent journalists • 25%
Analysis of media reports and public statements
CNN Probes Clarissa Ward's Report After Man Freed from Secret Damascus Prison Identified as Assad's Intelligence Officer
Dec 17, 2024, 02:15 PM
CNN has launched an investigation into a report that featured Clarissa Ward, the network's chief international correspondent, discovering and helping to free a man from a secret prison in Damascus. The man, who initially identified himself as Adel Gharbal, a civilian from Homs, claimed he had been imprisoned for three months. However, subsequent investigations by CNN and the Syrian fact-checking organization Verify-Sy revealed that the man was actually Salama Mohammad Salama, a first lieutenant in the Syrian Air Force Intelligence Directorate under the Assad regime. Known as 'Abu Hamza', Salama was notorious for managing security checkpoints in Homs and was involved in extortion, theft, and coercing residents into becoming informants. He was also implicated in the killing and torture of civilians during military operations in Homs in 2014. CNN confirmed Salama's identity using facial recognition software on a photograph provided by a resident of the Bayada neighborhood in Homs, which showed him in a government office wearing military clothing. The network has faced intense scrutiny and criticism for the report, with questions raised about the authenticity of the footage and whether CNN was misled or deliberately staged the event.
View original story
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Leaves CNN voluntarily • 25%
Remains at CNN with disciplinary action • 25%
Remains at CNN with no changes • 25%
Dismissed from CNN • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Mixed opinions • 25%
Majority view CNN unfavorably • 25%
No significant public reaction • 25%
Majority view CNN favorably • 25%
Staff changes • 25%
Public engagement initiatives • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Internal policy changes • 25%
No change in trust • 25%
Increased trust in CNN • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Decreased trust in CNN • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Report found to be fabricated • 25%
Report found to be partially inaccurate • 25%
Report confirmed as accurate • 25%
Low public awareness • 25%
Evenly split opinions • 25%
Majority believe CNN's report • 25%
Majority doubt CNN's report • 25%
Predominantly positive • 25%
Predominantly negative • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Little to no reaction • 25%
Joins another news network • 25%
Remains at CNN • 25%
Leaves journalism • 25%
Works independently • 25%