What will be the public reaction to CNN's handling of the Salama Mohammad Salama report by December 31, 2025?
Majority view CNN favorably • 25%
Majority view CNN unfavorably • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
No significant public reaction • 25%
Surveys or public opinion polls published by reputable polling organizations
CNN Faces Scrutiny After Salama Mohammad Salama, Assad Regime Intelligence Officer, Freed in Report on Torture and Killings
Dec 17, 2024, 07:37 AM
CNN is facing scrutiny after the network revealed that a Syrian prisoner it reported as being freed was actually a former intelligence officer for the Assad regime. The man, identified as Salama Mohammad Salama, had previously claimed to be a civilian victim of the regime. Reports indicate that he was involved in torture and killings during his service. Following the broadcast, CNN announced it is investigating the circumstances surrounding the report, particularly the identity of the man who may have provided a false identity during the segment. The network's chief international correspondent, Clarissa Ward, had filmed the dramatic rescue, which has since been criticized as potentially staged. Local sources have corroborated that Salama was, in fact, a first lieutenant in the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, raising questions about the integrity of the report and the authenticity of the rescue footage aired by CNN.
View original story
Increased trust in CNN • 25%
Decreased trust in CNN • 25%
No change in trust • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Low public awareness • 25%
Majority doubt CNN's report • 25%
Majority believe CNN's report • 25%
Evenly split opinions • 25%
Little to no reaction • 25%
Predominantly positive • 25%
Predominantly negative • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Clarissa Ward terminated • 25%
Clarissa Ward suspended • 25%
Clarissa Ward reprimanded • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Mostly Positive • 25%
No Significant Reaction • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Mostly Negative • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Report found to be entirely inaccurate • 25%
Report found to be partially inaccurate • 25%
Report confirmed as accurate • 25%
Internal policy changes • 25%
Public engagement initiatives • 25%
Staff changes • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Significant decrease • 25%
No change • 25%
Increase in credibility • 25%
Moderate decrease • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Significant decrease • 25%
Significant increase • 25%
Fluctuating trends • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Major policy changes announced • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
No policy changes announced • 25%
Minor policy changes announced • 25%