What will be the resolution regarding the CIO's authority to investigate insurrection charges by December 31, 2025?
Authority Confirmed • 25%
Authority Denied • 25%
Authority Limited • 25%
No Resolution • 25%
Official rulings or legislative changes in South Korea
Yoon Suk Yeol's Legal Team Challenges 'Illegal' Arrest Warrant Execution at Constitutional and Seoul Courts
Jan 3, 2025, 12:11 AM
The legal team representing South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol has announced plans to take legal action against what they describe as the 'illegal' and 'invalid' execution of an arrest warrant. The team, led by attorney Yoon Gap Geun, argues that the warrant's execution is unlawful because it was issued by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO), which they claim lacks the authority to investigate charges of insurrection against the president. The legal challenge is currently underway at the Constitutional Court and the Seoul Western District Court, where objections have been filed against the warrant's execution. The president's legal team contends that the warrant violates the Criminal Procedure Act and the Constitution, particularly in relation to the exclusion of provisions that protect military and official secret locations from search without consent.
View original story
Jurisdiction shared with another body • 25%
No decision reached • 25%
CIO denied jurisdiction • 25%
CIO confirmed to have jurisdiction • 25%
Bolsonaro found not guilty • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Bolsonaro found guilty • 25%
U.S. Capitol Police • 25%
FBI • 25%
Department of Homeland Security • 25%
Other • 25%
No evidence of political persecution • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Evidence leading to policy changes • 25%
Some evidence, no action • 25%
FBI • 25%
Other agencies • 25%
Capitol Police • 25%
DOJ • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No charges filed • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Charges filed against President Yoon • 25%
No resolution • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Allegations disproven • 25%
Allegations proven • 25%
Decree found legal • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Decree found unconstitutional • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
ATF • 25%
Joint task force • 25%
FBI • 25%
DHS • 25%
Cleared of all charges • 25%
Charged but not convicted • 25%
Convicted of insurrection • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Constitutional Court Ruling • 25%
Other Development • 25%
Withdrawal of Warrant • 25%
District Court Ruling • 25%