What will be the outcome of the NLRB complaint against 'Love Is Blind' producers by end of 2025?
Contestants classified as employees • 25%
Complaint dismissed • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Ongoing litigation beyond 2025 • 25%
Official NLRB rulings or court decisions
NLRB Classifies 'Love Is Blind' Contestants as Employees, Paving Way for Industry Change
Dec 13, 2024, 12:10 AM
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a complaint against the producers of Netflix's reality dating show 'Love Is Blind,' alleging that the show's contestants should be classified as employees rather than participants. This ruling could have significant implications for the reality television industry, potentially paving the way for unionization efforts among reality TV stars. The complaint, filed against Delirium TV and Kinetic Content, accuses the producers of misclassifying cast members to strip them of labor rights, including the ability to discuss working conditions and speak publicly about their experiences. It also highlights unlawful contractual terms related to confidentiality and noncompete provisions. The NLRB's action follows complaints by former contestants Renee Poche and Nick Thompson, who have been vocal about their experiences on the show. Poche's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, and Mark Geragos, along with their legal teams, have been working closely with the NLRB for over a year, aiming to change the reality TV industry. The complaint seeks to reclassify participants as employees, rescind unlawful agreements, and compensate former contestants for any financial harm caused by these practices. This development comes amidst growing allegations of exploitation and abuse in the reality TV sector, signaling a potential shift in how reality TV stars are treated under labor laws. Netflix declined to comment on the matter.
View original story
Settlement reached • 25%
Reclassification as employees • 25%
Dismissal of complaint • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Limited reclassification • 25%
Other impact • 25%
Widespread reclassification • 25%
No conclusive outcome • 34%
In favor of Baldoni • 33%
In favor of Lively • 33%
Complaint dismissed • 25%
Court ruling in favor of Baldoni • 25%
Court ruling in favor of Lively • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Ruled in favor of Baldoni • 25%
Ruled in favor of Lively/Reynolds • 25%
Settled • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Ruling upheld • 25%
Appeal dismissed • 25%
Ruling overturned • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Dismissal • 25%
NYT wins • 25%
Baldoni wins • 25%
Settlement • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Ruling in favor of Baldoni • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Verdict in favor of Baldoni • 25%
Verdict in favor of Lively • 25%
Case dismissed • 25%
Judgment in favor of Lively • 25%
Ruling in favor of Lively • 25%
Judgment in favor of Baldoni • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Settlement • 25%
Lively wins • 25%
Baldoni found liable • 25%
Settled out of court • 25%
Dismissal • 25%
Baldoni wins • 25%
Noncompete clauses removed • 25%
Confidentiality terms changed • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Other changes • 25%
No changes implemented • 25%
Changes proposed but not implemented • 25%
Major changes implemented • 25%
Minor changes implemented • 25%