What will be the outcome of prioritizing shipbuilding over climate change by end of 2025?
Increased Shipbuilding • 25%
Reduced Climate Initiatives • 25%
Balanced Approach • 25%
No Significant Change • 25%
Reports from defense analysts and official military assessments
Pete Hegseth, Confirmed by Senator Dan Sullivan, Prioritizes Shipbuilding Over Climate Change and Electric-Powered Tanks
Jan 14, 2025, 04:51 PM
During a recent confirmation hearing, Pete Hegseth stated that if confirmed as Secretary of the Navy, his focus will be on shipbuilding and military lethality rather than climate change. Responding to a question from Senator Dan Sullivan, Hegseth asserted that he would dismiss any Secretary of the Navy who prioritizes climate initiatives over shipbuilding. He further emphasized that the Secretary of the Army would not concentrate on electric-powered tanks, reiterating a commitment to military effectiveness over environmental considerations. Hegseth's remarks reflect a broader stance on defense priorities in the face of ongoing debates about climate policy within the military sector.
View original story
Increase in fossil fuel incentives • 25%
No significant policy changes • 25%
Rollback of existing climate policies • 25%
Introduction of new climate policies • 25%
Moderate progress • 25%
Significant progress • 25%
Regressive actions • 25%
No progress • 25%
Ban remains in effect • 25%
Ban modified but in effect • 25%
Ban fully overturned • 25%
Ban partially overturned • 25%
No projects completed • 25%
Few projects completed • 25%
Most projects completed • 25%
All projects completed • 25%
Less than $10 billion • 25%
More than $30 billion • 25%
$21-30 billion • 25%
$10-20 billion • 25%
Withdrawn • 25%
Not passed • 25%
Passed but not implemented • 25%
Passed and implemented • 25%
Construction does not resume • 25%
Construction resumes but does not complete • 25%
Construction resumes and completes • 25%
Other • 25%
Diversification into renewable energy • 25%
Other strategic focus • 25%
Focus on defense sector • 25%
Expansion of shipbuilding capabilities • 25%
Other • 25%
Shipping routes • 25%
Military presence • 25%
Mineral resources • 25%
Further withdrawal from climate initiatives • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Reversal of NGFS exit • 25%
Increased independence • 25%
Materials unused • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Legal challenges halt construction • 25%
Completed new sections • 25%
Infrastructure investment • 25%
Spending cuts • 25%
Debt reduction • 25%
Tax cuts • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
More Traditional Equipment • 25%
No Major Shifts • 25%
Focus on Lethality • 25%
More Innovative Technologies • 25%