What will be the outcome of Google's antitrust trial with the DOJ by end of 2024?
Google prevails • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Google forced to divest Chrome • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Court rulings or official announcements from the U.S. Department of Justice
Google Proposes Non-Exclusive Search Deals and Unbundling to Counter DOJ's Demand for Chrome Sale
Dec 24, 2024, 08:42 AM
Google is attempting to address antitrust concerns by proposing alternatives to the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) suggestion that it should sell its Chrome browser. Google's counterproposal includes revising its search distribution agreements with partners like Apple and Mozilla to be non-exclusive, allowing partners to enter into multiple default search engine deals across different platforms and change their default search provider annually. Additionally, Google suggests allowing device manufacturers more flexibility to preload multiple search services and unbundle services like the Play Store, Chrome browser, and Google Search. The DOJ, however, seeks more drastic measures, including the potential sale of Chrome and Android, to restore competition in online search. Apple, which benefits from a $20 billion annual deal with Google to set it as the default search engine on Safari, has asked to participate in Google's upcoming antitrust trial, arguing that Google can no longer adequately represent Apple's interests as it defends against efforts to break up its business units. Apple's senior vice president of services, Eddy Cue, has stated that Apple has no plans to develop its own search engine, citing the high cost, the rapid evolution of search due to AI, and the need for a platform to sell targeted advertising, which is not a core business for Apple.
View original story
DOJ wins case • 25%
Case ongoing into 2026 • 25%
Google wins case • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Google wins • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Google loses, divestment required • 25%
Google loses, no divestment • 25%
Google's remedies accepted • 25%
Case ongoing • 25%
Case settled with other terms • 25%
Chrome sale required • 25%
Operational restrictions • 25%
Fines imposed • 25%
Other • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Data sharing mandate • 25%
No action • 25%
Both actions • 25%
Chrome divestment • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Forced sale of Chrome • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Prohibition of exclusive contracts • 25%
DOJ's proposal accepted • 25%
Compromise solution • 25%
Case unresolved • 25%
Google's proposal accepted • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Case ongoing • 25%
Google wins • 25%
Google loses • 25%
Accepted without changes • 25%
Rejected • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Accepted with modifications • 25%
Agreements terminated • 25%
Other changes • 25%
Non-exclusive agreements • 25%
Exclusive agreements maintained • 25%