Outcome of Google's antitrust case by end of 2025
Google's proposal accepted • 25%
DOJ's proposal accepted • 25%
Compromise solution • 25%
Case unresolved • 25%
Court rulings or official announcements from Google or DOJ
Google Proposes Loosening Search Engine Deals, Opposes U.S. DOJ's Chrome Sale Demand
Dec 21, 2024, 05:19 AM
Alphabet Inc.'s Google has proposed to loosen its default search engine agreements with companies like Apple to address a U.S. antitrust ruling that found the company unlawfully dominates online search. The proposal, which Google filed on Friday, aims to avoid more drastic measures such as selling its Chrome browser, as suggested by the U.S. Department of Justice. Google has urged U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta to proceed cautiously in determining remedies, following his ruling that Google holds an illegal monopoly in online search and related advertising. The company's proposal includes making its Android agreements with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) non-exclusive and allowing them to unbundle the Google Play Store from Chrome and Search. Google also opposes the DOJ's proposal to sell Chrome, calling it 'extreme' and at odds with the law, arguing that such a move could stifle innovation and future investment.
View original story
Case ongoing • 25%
Case settled with other terms • 25%
Chrome sale required • 25%
Google's remedies accepted • 25%
Prohibition of exclusive contracts • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Forced sale of Chrome • 25%
Google wins case • 25%
Case ongoing into 2026 • 25%
DOJ wins case • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Google wins • 25%
Google loses • 25%
Case ongoing • 25%
Google wins • 25%
Google loses, divestment required • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Google loses, no divestment • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Google forced to divest Chrome • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Google prevails • 25%
Rejected • 25%
Accepted with modifications • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Accepted without changes • 25%
Other • 25%
Fines imposed • 25%
Operational restrictions • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Chrome divestment • 25%
Both actions • 25%
Data sharing mandate • 25%
No action • 25%
Loosened agreements • 25%
Agreement terminated • 25%
Stricter agreements • 25%
No change • 25%