Market
What will be the impact of the new ICE and CBP policy on community trust in law enforcement by the end of 2025?
1
Trump•Department of Homeland Security•DHS•Immigration and Customs Enforcement•ICE•Customs and Border Protection•Benjamine Huffman
Resolution / Starting Odds
Increased Trust • 25%
Decreased Trust • 25%
No Change • 25%
Mixed Results • 25%
Surveys and studies conducted by academic institutions or research organizations
Story
Trump Administration Allows ICE and CBP to Arrest Criminal Aliens at Schools, Churches, and Hospitals
Jan 21, 2025, 10:55 PM
The Trump administration has revoked policies that previously limited immigration enforcement actions at sensitive locations such as schools, churches, and hospitals. This change, announced by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), allows Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers to conduct arrests in these areas. The move is part of a broader strategy to strengthen immigration law enforcement, with DHS stating that it aims to prevent criminals from using these locations as sanctuaries to evade arrest. Acting DHS Secretary Benjamine Huffman emphasized that this action empowers law enforcement to apprehend criminal aliens who have entered the U.S. illegally. The policy shift marks a significant departure from guidelines established in 2011 and 2013, which were designed to protect vulnerable populations and maintain community trust.
View original story
Similar markets
Other • 25%
No change • 25%
Less favorable • 25%
More favorable • 25%
Moderate Increase • 25%
Significant Increase • 25%
No Change • 25%
Decrease • 25%
Strongly Oppose • 25%
Somewhat Oppose • 25%
Somewhat Support • 25%
Strongly Support • 25%
Other • 25%
More opposed • 25%
More supportive • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Decrease from 68% • 25%
Remain the same • 25%
Increase from 68% • 25%
No data available • 25%
Increase in Sanctuary Policies • 25%
Other • 25%
Decrease in Sanctuary Policies • 25%
No Change • 25%
Widespread protests • 25%
Legal challenges • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Increased sanctuary cities • 25%
Other • 25%
Support and cooperate • 25%
Oppose and obstruct • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Majority oppose • 25%
No clear consensus • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Evenly split • 25%
Partial cooperation • 25%
Full cooperation • 25%
Legal challenges • 25%
No cooperation • 25%
Relationship deteriorates • 25%
Unclear impact • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Relationship improves • 25%