What will be Apple's stance in Google's antitrust trial by end of 2024?
Apple supports Google • 25%
Apple opposes Google • 25%
Apple remains neutral • 25%
Apple withdraws from case • 25%
Court documents or official statements from Apple
Google Proposes Non-Exclusive Search Deals and Unbundling to Counter DOJ's Demand for Chrome Sale
Dec 24, 2024, 08:42 AM
Google is attempting to address antitrust concerns by proposing alternatives to the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) suggestion that it should sell its Chrome browser. Google's counterproposal includes revising its search distribution agreements with partners like Apple and Mozilla to be non-exclusive, allowing partners to enter into multiple default search engine deals across different platforms and change their default search provider annually. Additionally, Google suggests allowing device manufacturers more flexibility to preload multiple search services and unbundle services like the Play Store, Chrome browser, and Google Search. The DOJ, however, seeks more drastic measures, including the potential sale of Chrome and Android, to restore competition in online search. Apple, which benefits from a $20 billion annual deal with Google to set it as the default search engine on Safari, has asked to participate in Google's upcoming antitrust trial, arguing that Google can no longer adequately represent Apple's interests as it defends against efforts to break up its business units. Apple's senior vice president of services, Eddy Cue, has stated that Apple has no plans to develop its own search engine, citing the high cost, the rapid evolution of search due to AI, and the need for a platform to sell targeted advertising, which is not a core business for Apple.
View original story
Chrome sale required • 25%
Google's remedies accepted • 25%
Case settled with other terms • 25%
Case ongoing • 25%
Case ongoing into 2026 • 25%
Google wins case • 25%
DOJ wins case • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Google wins • 25%
Google loses, no divestment • 25%
Google loses, divestment required • 25%
Compromise solution • 25%
Case unresolved • 25%
Google's proposal accepted • 25%
DOJ's proposal accepted • 25%
No change in agreements • 25%
Multiple defaults allowed • 25%
Agreements terminated • 25%
Single default maintained • 25%
Guilty • 25%
Not Guilty • 25%
Case Dismissed • 25%
Settlement • 25%
Case ongoing • 25%
Google wins • 25%
Google loses • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Operational restrictions • 25%
Other • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Fines imposed • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Forced sale of Chrome • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Prohibition of exclusive contracts • 25%
Agreements terminated • 25%
Other changes • 25%
Non-exclusive agreements • 25%
Exclusive agreements maintained • 25%