Status of Swiss motion for peace forum by end of 2025
Forum successfully held • 25%
Forum planned but not yet held • 25%
Motion withdrawn • 25%
No progress made • 25%
Swiss government publications or international news coverage
Swiss Federal Council Passes 96-80 Motion for Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Forum, Parliament Bans Hezbollah with 126 Votes
Dec 17, 2024, 04:33 PM
The Swiss Federal Council has passed a motion with a vote of 96-80 and 16 abstentions, calling for Switzerland to host an international peace forum. The forum aims to facilitate an open dialogue between Azerbaijan and representatives of the Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians under international supervision. This initiative is seen as a step forward in securing the right of return for the people of Nagorno-Karabakh, specifically the safe return of Armenians. Switzerland's National Council has approved this motion, with parliamentarians MullerAltermatt and WalderNicolas explaining the significance and next steps. In a separate development, the Swiss parliament's lower house has approved a proposal to ban the Lebanese militia group Hezbollah, describing it as a paramilitary terrorist organization. The ban against Hezbollah passed with 126 votes in favor, 20 against, and 41 abstentions, despite opposition from the Swiss government, citing Hezbollah as a threat to international security and aiming to secure the right of the expelled population to safely return home.
View original story
Strengthened diplomatic relations • 25%
No significant diplomatic change • 25%
Deterioration in relations • 25%
Formal apology from Iran • 25%
USA, Russia, Ukraine, EU • 25%
USA, Russia, Ukraine • 25%
Other combinations • 25%
USA, Russia only • 25%
United Nations • 25%
Other • 25%
Arab League • 25%
European Union • 25%
European Union • 25%
Other • 25%
United States • 25%
Russia • 25%
Minimal public reaction • 25%
Public support for Iran's handling • 25%
Moderate public concern • 25%
Major public outcry • 25%
Proposal rejected by one or more parties • 25%
Agreement to deploy peacekeeping forces • 25%
Continued discussions without agreement • 25%
No official outcome announced • 25%
Successful Transition • 25%
Partial Transition • 25%
Failed Transition • 25%
Ongoing Transition • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Diplomatic ties severed • 25%
Relations remain the same • 25%
Relations worsen • 25%
Relations improve • 25%
Complete overhaul • 25%
Significant changes • 25%
No change • 25%
Minor adjustments • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Supportive of the ban • 25%
No official response • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Critical of the ban • 25%