Economic impact on Greenland from U.S. annexation proposal by end of 2025?
Positive impact • 25%
Negative impact • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Unclear impact • 25%
Economic reports from Greenland's government or international economic organizations
Trump's Greenland Proposal Could Be Largest U.S. Acquisition Since Louisiana Purchase, Surpassing 1803 Deal
Dec 24, 2024, 09:19 PM
President-elect Donald Trump's proposal to annex Greenland is being characterized as the largest potential territorial acquisition in U.S. history. According to reports, if successful, the annexation would surpass the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, which nearly doubled the size of the United States. The New York Post highlighted that this move could significantly shape Trump's legacy, marking the first major U.S. acquisition in over a century. Analysts are noting the historical implications of such an acquisition, which would represent a pivotal moment in U.S. territorial expansion.
View original story
New economic agreements • 25%
Increased economic ties • 25%
Decreased economic ties • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increased cooperation without sale • 25%
Rejection of sale • 25%
Negotiation for sale • 25%
No response • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Closer alignment with Denmark • 25%
Closer alignment with another country • 25%
Closer alignment with the US • 25%
Moderate increase • 25%
Decrease • 25%
Significant increase • 25%
No change • 25%
Other • 25%
Greenland reaffirms sovereignty • 25%
Formal negotiations start • 25%
Interest officially dropped • 25%
No change in status • 25%
Formal negotiations initiated • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
No significant developments • 25%
Withdrawn by U.S. • 25%
Accepted by Denmark • 25%
No Proposal Made • 25%
Rejected by Denmark • 25%
Partnership with China • 25%
No new agreements • 25%
Trade agreement with USA • 25%
Free trade with EU • 25%
Maintains current status • 25%
Increased autonomy • 25%
Other changes • 25%
Becomes U.S. territory • 25%
Willingness to negotiate • 25%
Firm rejection • 25%
No official response • 25%
Other • 25%
Oppose U.S. Offer • 25%
Support U.S. Offer • 25%
Remain Neutral • 25%
No Official Statement • 25%
Diplomatic Agreement • 25%
No Action • 25%
Military Action • 25%
Economic Coercion • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Neutral • 25%
No official response • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Opposed • 25%