Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitImpact of SCOTUS ghost gun ruling on state laws by June 2026?
Strengthen state laws • 25%
Weaken state laws • 25%
No impact • 25%
Mixed impact • 25%
Changes in state legislation or legal challenges reported in state law databases or major news outlets.
Supreme Court to Hear Garland v. VanDerStok on Biden's Ghost Gun Regulations
Oct 8, 2024, 02:00 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in Garland v. VanDerStok, a pivotal case regarding the Biden-Harris administration's regulations on homemade firearms, commonly known as ghost guns. The case will determine whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) exceeded its authority with a 2022 rule requiring licenses, background checks, and serial numbers for weapon parts kits. The regulation, part of the Harris-Biden rule, aims to treat self-assembled guns and parts kits the same as traditional firearms. It also includes a provision to eliminate the 20-year destruction rule and make ATF Forms 4473 permanent documents, covering all commercially transferred firearms since August 2002. Critics argue that the rule represents regulatory overreach, while supporters contend it is necessary for public safety. The decision could have significant implications for gun control and the Second Amendment rights in the United States.
View original story
Increase in state regulations • 25%
Decrease in state regulations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
Increase in state regulations • 25%
Decrease in state regulations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
Increase in state regulations • 25%
Decrease in state regulations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
Most states adopt similar regulations • 25%
Most states oppose or challenge regulations • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
No significant state action • 25%
Uphold regulation • 25%
Strike down regulation • 25%
Modify regulation • 25%
Dismiss case • 25%
Regulation upheld • 25%
Regulation struck down • 25%
Partial modification • 25%
Case remanded • 25%
Uphold restrictions • 25%
Strike down restrictions • 25%
Partial modifications • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Increase regulations • 25%
Decrease regulations • 25%
No change • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
Increase in state restrictions • 25%
Decrease in state restrictions • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Uphold regulation • 25%
Strike down regulation • 25%
Partial modification • 25%
Remand to lower court • 25%
Significant impact on elections • 33%
Moderate impact on elections • 33%
No impact on elections • 34%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Strike down regulations • 25%
Remand case • 25%
Uphold regulations • 25%
Modify regulations • 25%