Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow will states respond to the Supreme Court's ghost gun regulation decision by end of 2025?
Most states adopt similar regulations • 25%
Most states oppose or challenge regulations • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
No significant state action • 25%
Legislative records from state governments or major news outlets
Supreme Court Likely to Uphold Biden's Ghost Gun Regulation in Garland v. VanDerStok
Oct 8, 2024, 01:42 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a significant case on Tuesday regarding the Biden administration's regulation of 'ghost guns,' which are firearms assembled from kits or 3D-printed parts that lack serial numbers and are difficult to trace. The case, Garland v. VanDerStok, challenges a 2022 rule from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) that mandates these kits to have serial numbers and requires purchasers to undergo background checks. The regulation aims to curb the proliferation of untraceable weapons, which have been linked to a rise in crime. Early indications suggest that the Supreme Court justices are likely to uphold the regulation, with several justices expressing skepticism towards the challenge. If upheld, the rule would enforce background checks, serial numbers, and sales records for ghost guns, aligning them with other firearms regulations. The justices seemed to agree that the 1968 Gun Control Act allows the regulation of untraceable weapons assembled from kits, and Justice Barrett and Chief Justice Roberts appeared skeptical of the challenge from the 5th Circuit.
View original story
Increase in state regulations • 25%
Decrease in state regulations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
Increase regulations • 25%
Decrease regulations • 25%
No change • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
Increase in state regulations • 25%
Decrease in state regulations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
Increase in state regulations • 25%
Decrease in state regulations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
Strengthen state laws • 25%
Weaken state laws • 25%
No impact • 25%
Mixed impact • 25%
Uphold regulation • 25%
Strike down regulation • 25%
Modify regulation • 25%
Dismiss case • 25%
Increase in state restrictions • 25%
Decrease in state restrictions • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Regulation upheld • 25%
Regulation struck down • 25%
Partial modification • 25%
Case remanded • 25%
Uphold regulation • 25%
Strike down regulation • 25%
Partial modification • 25%
Remand to lower court • 25%
Uphold regulations • 25%
Strike down regulations • 25%
Modify regulations • 25%
Remand case • 25%
Uphold restrictions • 25%
Strike down restrictions • 25%
Partial modifications • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Increase in support for regulation • 25%
Decrease in support for regulation • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Polarized opinions • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Majority support regulation • 33%
No significant change • 34%
Majority oppose regulation • 33%