Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow will the public respond to the NLRB's action on 'Love Is Blind' by mid-2025?
Widespread support for contestants • 25%
Mixed public opinion • 25%
Widespread support for producers • 25%
Minimal public interest • 25%
Surveys or reports from major news outlets
NLRB Classifies 'Love Is Blind' Contestants as Employees, Paving Way for Industry Change
Dec 13, 2024, 12:10 AM
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a complaint against the producers of Netflix's reality dating show 'Love Is Blind,' alleging that the show's contestants should be classified as employees rather than participants. This ruling could have significant implications for the reality television industry, potentially paving the way for unionization efforts among reality TV stars. The complaint, filed against Delirium TV and Kinetic Content, accuses the producers of misclassifying cast members to strip them of labor rights, including the ability to discuss working conditions and speak publicly about their experiences. It also highlights unlawful contractual terms related to confidentiality and noncompete provisions. The NLRB's action follows complaints by former contestants Renee Poche and Nick Thompson, who have been vocal about their experiences on the show. Poche's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, and Mark Geragos, along with their legal teams, have been working closely with the NLRB for over a year, aiming to change the reality TV industry. The complaint seeks to reclassify participants as employees, rescind unlawful agreements, and compensate former contestants for any financial harm caused by these practices. This development comes amidst growing allegations of exploitation and abuse in the reality TV sector, signaling a potential shift in how reality TV stars are treated under labor laws. Netflix declined to comment on the matter.
View original story
Reclassification as employees • 25%
Dismissal of complaint • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Widespread reclassification • 25%
Limited reclassification • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Other impact • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Complies without appeal • 25%
Complies but files an appeal • 25%
Does not comply and files an appeal • 25%
Other • 25%
Accept ruling and bargain • 25%
Appeal ruling • 25%
Seek legislative changes • 25%
Other • 25%
Mostly negative • 25%
Mostly positive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Majority support Jay-Z and Diddy • 25%
Majority against Jay-Z and Diddy • 25%
Opinion is divided • 25%
Majority indifferent • 25%
Widespread acceptance • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Widespread skepticism • 25%
Investigation ignored • 25%
Positive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Negative • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Mostly supportive • 25%
Mostly critical • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
No changes implemented • 25%
Changes proposed but not implemented • 25%
Major changes implemented • 25%
Minor changes implemented • 25%