Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow will international allies react to Trump's Schedule F reforms by March 31, 2025?
Supportive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Critical • 25%
Other • 25%
Statements from international governments or credible news reports
Trump to Dismantle 'Deep State' with Schedule F Reforms Ahead of Monday Inauguration
Jan 18, 2025, 08:04 PM
President-elect Donald Trump is preparing to implement sweeping changes to the federal government upon taking office on Monday, with plans to dismantle what he and his allies refer to as the 'deep state.' Central to his strategy is an executive order known as 'Schedule F,' which would reclassify approximately 50,000 federal employees, removing job protections and allowing for their replacement with politically aligned appointees. Critics argue this move could undermine the independence of federal agencies and create a politically controlled bureaucracy. Germany's ambassador to the U.S., Andreas Michaelis, has expressed concerns over these plans, warning in a confidential analysis of a potential 'maximum concentration of power' under Trump, which could erode democratic principles such as the separation of powers and media independence. The ambassador also highlighted the potential for misuse of law enforcement, the judiciary, and even the military for domestic policing tasks under the incoming administration. Trump's allies, including former officials like Russell Vought and Pam Bondi, have defended these measures as necessary to ensure alignment with the administration's agenda. The American Accountability Foundation has also supported the move, targeting federal employees they claim oppose Trump's priorities. Elon Musk, a key ally, is reportedly involved in efforts to reshape the federal government. Additionally, Trump has proposed creating a Department of Government Efficiency to streamline federal operations. The plans have drawn significant criticism from labor unions, legal experts, and international observers, who fear the changes could lead to a politicized and less accountable federal government.
View original story
Supportive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No official statement • 25%
Critical • 25%
Mostly positive • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Mostly negative • 25%
Retaliatory tariffs • 25%
Diplomatic protests • 25%
Negotiations • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Majority resist • 25%
Majority comply • 25%
Indeterminate • 25%
Mixed response • 25%
Divided • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Critical • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Unsuccessful • 25%
Partially successful • 25%
Successful in blocking key policies • 25%
Increased border security • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Military action • 25%
New international alliances • 25%
Mostly opposed • 25%
Mostly supportive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
No Significant Change • 25%
Strengthened Alliances • 25%
Other • 25%
Weakened Alliances • 25%
Neutral reception • 25%
Mixed reception • 25%
Positive reception • 25%
Negative reception • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No response • 25%
Support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Other • 25%
Increased Independence • 25%
No Change • 25%
Decreased Independence • 25%