Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWill Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment be ruled unconstitutional by the end of 2024?
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Official court rulings or announcements
Supreme Court's Presidential Immunity Ruling Sparks Controversy as Trump Seeks Dismissal of Classified Docs Case
Jul 5, 2024, 06:10 PM
The Supreme Court's recent ruling on presidential immunity has sparked significant debate and controversy. The decision, which grants former President Donald Trump immunity from prosecution for actions taken as part of his official duties, has been criticized for potentially enabling presidential misconduct. Critics argue that the ruling allows Trump to obstruct justice without facing legal consequences, as seen in the case of the Russia investigation. Trump's legal team is leveraging the ruling to challenge the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment and to seek a dismissal of the classified documents case, with Judge Cannon being asked to weigh in. The ruling has broader implications, with concerns that it could shield future presidents, including Joe Biden, from accountability. Justice Sotomayor's dissent warned that the decision could lead to unchecked presidential power, while supporters argue it protects the constitutional separation of powers. Justice Thomas' concurrence and the conservative supermajority's influence were also notable in the ruling.
View original story
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Appointment constitutional • 25%
Appointment unconstitutional • 25%
Funding constitutional • 25%
Funding unconstitutional • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No impact • 25%
Mixed impact • 25%
Decreased presidential immunity • 25%
Increased presidential immunity • 25%
Ongoing • 25%
Dismissed • 25%
Trump found guilty • 25%
Trump found not guilty • 25%