Loading...
Market
Will Giggle appeal the Federal Court's ruling in the Tickle v Giggle case by December 31, 2024?
4
Resolution / Starting Odds
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Australian Federal Court records or public announcements
Story
Federal Court Orders $10,000 Damages for Indirect Discrimination in Tickle v Giggle Case
Aug 22, 2024, 11:12 PM
The Federal Court of Australia has ruled in favor of Roxane Tickle in the Tickle v Giggle case, finding that she was indirectly discriminated against by Sall Grover's Giggle app. The court ordered Giggle to pay Tickle $10,000 in damages and cover her legal costs. The case centered around the app's policy of restricting access to female-only spaces, which Tickle, a transgender woman, claimed was discriminatory. The court found that the app failed to distinguish between cisgender men and transgender women, leading to the ruling of indirect gender identity discrimination. The verdict was delivered at 9am Friday, Sydney time, and was available via livestream. The decision has sparked debate over women's rights and the definition of gender identity in Australia.
View original story
Similar markets
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Ruling upheld • 25%
Ruling overturned • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Appeal withdrawn • 25%
Ruling upheld • 25%
Ruling overturned • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Appeal withdrawn • 25%
New lawsuits filed • 25%
No new lawsuits • 25%
Class action lawsuit • 25%
Settlement agreements • 25%
Policy change • 25%
Appeal the ruling • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Verdict overturned • 25%
Verdict upheld • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Appeal withdrawn • 25%