Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhich senator will support/oppose future FISA amendments by end of 2024?
Rand Paul supports amendments • 25%
Mike Lee supports amendments • 25%
Chuck Schumer opposes amendments • 25%
Elizabeth Warren supports amendments • 25%
Official statements, voting records, or major news outlets
Senate Passes Two-Year FISA Extension in 60-34 Vote After Deadline
Apr 20, 2024, 01:59 AM
The U.S. Senate has successfully passed a two-year extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), specifically Section 702, just minutes after the midnight deadline, with a final vote of 60-34. This action, facilitated by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, aligns with the House's version of the bill, ensuring that the surveillance program remains operational under a tight deadline. The reauthorization comes amid widespread debate and controversy, with several senators, including Rand Paul and Mike Lee, pushing for amendments to include more stringent warrant requirements to protect Americans' civil liberties. Despite these efforts, the Senate ultimately rejected seven different amendments aimed at reforming FISA 702, leading to criticism that the bill lacks sufficient safeguards for the rights of U.S. citizens.
View original story
0-2 amendments passed • 25%
3-5 amendments passed • 25%
6-8 amendments passed • 25%
More than 8 amendments passed • 25%
Extension of surveillance powers • 25%
Restriction of surveillance powers • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Complete repeal of relevant sections of FISA 702 • 25%
Senator Elizabeth Warren • 33%
Senator Bernie Sanders • 33%
Rep. Maxine Waters • 33%
0-2 amendments • 25%
3-5 amendments • 25%
6-8 amendments • 25%
More than 8 amendments • 25%
Majority Support • 33%
Majority Oppose • 33%
Evenly Split • 33%
Yes, Senate passes the bill • 50%
No, Senate rejects the bill • 50%
Less favorable • 50%
More favorable • 50%
Increase in surveillance-related complaints • 25%
Legal victories upholding new surveillance • 25%
No significant impact on cases • 25%
Legal setbacks challenging surveillance • 25%