Loading...
Market
Which public health policy will RFK Jr. prioritize if confirmed as HHS Secretary?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
End taxpayer-funded junk food in food stamps • 25%
Promote domestic medicine production • 25%
Ensure vaccines fully tested before release • 25%
Address chemicals in food • 25%
Official policy announcements from HHS or government
Story
RFK Jr. Pushes for Daughter-in-Law at CIA, Faces Opposition as HHS Nominee
Dec 11, 2024, 04:16 PM
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nominated by President Donald Trump for the position of Secretary of Health and Human Services, is reportedly advocating for his daughter-in-law, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, to be appointed as the deputy director of the CIA. This push is motivated by RFK Jr.'s belief that the CIA was involved in the assassination of his uncle, President John F. Kennedy. Over 75 Nobel laureates have expressed opposition to Kennedy's potential role at HHS, citing concerns about the impact on public health and research. Meanwhile, Kennedy's tenure at HHS could lead to significant changes in healthcare policy, including ending taxpayer-funded junk food in food stamps, promoting domestic medicine production, ensuring vaccines are fully tested before release, and addressing concerns about chemicals in food.
View original story
Similar markets
Abortion policy • 25%
Other health policy • 25%
Healthy food initiative • 25%
Vaccine policy • 25%
Vaccine Policy • 25%
Healthcare Reform • 25%
Public Health Campaign • 25%
Other • 25%
Tackling Big Pharma • 25%
Other • 25%
Food Safety • 25%
Addressing Chronic Diseases • 25%
Focus on other health issues • 25%
Vaccine policy changes • 25%
No major changes • 25%
Resignation or removal • 25%
Vaccine Policy • 25%
Chronic Disease • 25%
Health Risks and Climate Change • 25%
Other • 25%
Abortion Policy • 25%
Vaccine Policy • 25%
Obesity Crisis • 25%
Food Regulation • 25%
Other initiatives • 25%
Vaccine policy reform • 25%
Food regulation reform • 25%
Healthcare system overhaul • 25%
Healthcare access • 25%
Other • 25%
Pharmaceutical regulations • 25%
Food quality standards • 25%
Stance on pharmaceutical companies • 25%
Stance on food industry • 25%
General bipartisan cooperation • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Looser vaccine regulations • 25%
Stricter vaccine regulations • 25%
Other major health policy changes • 25%
Pro-vaccine stance • 25%
No statement • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Anti-vaccine stance • 25%
Cancer rates • 25%
Other health issue • 25%
Autism rates • 25%
Vaccine safety • 25%